Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of June 15 - 19, 2020
June 19, 2020

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

US v. Oliver - sentencing
Hyde v. Irish - sanctions without jurisdiction
Amy v. Carnival - maritime, negligence
US v. Allen - sentencing
Swain v. Junior - prison conditions, COVID

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

Fla Bar v. Herman - bar discipline

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Evans Rowing v. Jacksonville - triple concurrences, land use, certiorari
Johnson v. Johnson - alimony, child support
Lewis v. DOR - child support

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Catalano v. State - Stand Your Ground
Owners Ins v. Allstate - insurance, UM coverage 
Furst v. Rebholz - homestead, rental space, constitutional challenge
Ricketts v. Ricketts - certiorari, medical records
Burke Prods v. Access Elec - personal jurisdiction
Gaudet v. State - sentencing
Rodriguez v. State - sentencing
Edwin Taylor v. Griffin Contr - lien priority
Downs v. State - postconviction relief

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Lexington Ins v. Mintz Truppman - prohibition, federal court fees
Garcia v. JPMorgan Chase - homestead, lien
Mitchell v. State - Williams rule evidence
Silver Law v. Bates - § 57.105 sanctions
Barber v. State - prohibition, judicial disqualification
ESJ JI v. Airplay Adv - independent tort doctrine, scope of notice of appeal
Marwan v. Sahmoud - prohibition, judicial disqualification
Figueredo v. Cordero - hearing attendance, prisoner
AH v. State - sentencing
Tahan v. Munoz - non-party discovery, interrogatories, ilk
Tamiami Elec v. Infinity - second-tier certiorari, circuit court appeals

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Morales v. State - probation revocation
Johnstone v. State - stalking, probation
O’Neal v. State - sentencing
Lewis v. US Bank - foreclosure, lost note
Lucky Nation v. Al-Maghazchi - re-foreclosure, redemption
Lewis v. Broward County Sch Bd - teaching contracts
Lugassy v. Lugassy - right to contract

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Singh v. Walt Disney Parks - tax assessment, real property
State v. Brown - sentence, downward departure
LAT v. State - firearm, public discharge; dismissal
Chappell v. State - sentence, cost
Discount Sleep v. Ocala - fire service, tax, user fee
Carlson v. State - criminal; continuance, plea withdrawal
Seiwert v. Seiwert - post-dissolution, recusal
Gause v. State - Anders appeal, cost
Miller v. State - Anders appeal, cost
Moran v. State - Spencer warning, pro se
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.