Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of May 18 - 22, 2020

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Statton v. Fla Fed JNC - FOIA, judicial nominating commission
Compulife v. Rutstein - copyright, trade secrets, false advertising, computer hacking

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

Phillips v. State - capital case, postconviction relief
In re R Reg Fla Bar - amended rule 21-4.1, military spouses
State v. Johnson - jury selection, preservation of error

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Wesson v. Fla Peninsula Ins - fees multiplier, contingency cases
JAX Refrig v. Chin - temporary injunction
Joseph v. State - jury selection
Roshell v. State - competency
Davis v. State - competency
Washington v. State - Stand Your Ground
In re Grd Jury - grand jury report
Morgan v. Am Airlines - workers' compensation
Vinson v. Vinson - contempt, equitable distribution
Walker v. State - communications device, unlawful use
Kerridge v. State - scrivener's error
Lowery v. State - scrivener's error

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Sullivan v. State - Stand Your Ground
USF Trustees v. Carter - empty chair, causation; Stuart v. Hertz instruction
Reynolds Ventures v. Gilbert - appellate jurisdiction
Pinello v. State - probation revocation
State v. Kendrick - appellate counsel sanctions
Houston v. Tampa Firefight Pension - retirement benefits
Gokay v. State - probation, STD test
CG v. MM - paternity, timesharing

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Demircan v. Mikhaylov - probate, trust, fees
State v. Quero - sentencing
State v. Garcia - certiorari, sentencing
Robinson v. State - sentencing
Deshazior v. Safepoint - insurance, seepage exclusion
Mordica v. State - burglary; cross-exam, prior inconsistent statements
Hernandez v. Citizens - insurance, earth movement exclusion
McWilliams v. State - due process, identification procedures
Miami Bch v. Fla Gas - appellate jurisdiction
Old Cutler Lakes v. SRP SUB - property, foreclosure, past due assessments
Gilbert v. Gilbert - marital settlement agreement
Morales Law Grp v. Rodman - service of process
Hechevarria-Figuerro v. State - habeas corpus

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Coto v. State - double jeopardy
Kokhan v. Auto Club Ins - insurance, exclusion
Atallah v. Transworld Bus Brokers - sale, commission
Thomas v. State - assault, element
Griffin v. Palm Beach BCC - summary judgment, affirmative defense
US Bank v. Buchanan - foreclosure, lost note
Rehab Ctr at Hollywood Hills v. FPL - duty, energy supply
Lockett v. State - jury request, view defendant
Jallali v. Christiana - wrongful foreclosure
Henderson Behavioral Health v. Cortes - medical malpractice, presuit

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Arnold v. State - Anders appeal, written order
Hillman v. State - Anders appeal, oral pronouncement
Miller v. Miller - dissolution, attorney's fees
Specialty Solutions v. Baxter Gypsum - default, unliquidated damages, void
Turpenning v. State - Anders appeal, costs
Willoughby v. State - murder, theft, harmless error
Taylor v. State - cost, § 318.18(11)(b)
Milton v. State - Anders appeal, cost of investigation
GEICO v. Accident Injury Clinic - certiorari, discovery, Irizarry
Jones v. Jones - dissolution, alimony, injunction
Banash v. State - postconviction relief
Smith v. State - habeas corpus
Jackson v. State - Spencer warning, pro se
Sapeg v. State - sentence
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.