Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of April 12 - 16, 2021
U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals
US v Russell - sentence reduction
In re: Courtney Wild - en banc, Jeffrey Epstein, Crime Victims' Right Act
Miller v. Gizmodo - defamation, fair report privilege
Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski - nominal damages, mootness
Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee
Doty v. State - order denying rehearing, concurrence
Woodbury v. State - capital case, direct appeal
In re R Reg Fla Bar - amended bar rule, CLE programs, prohibiting quotas
First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee
Hartz v. Wells Fargo - foreclosure, condition precedent, VA regs, amounts owed
McArthur v. State - inadvertent photo display, Miranda, text messages
Gibson v. State - prior consistent statement
Coleman v. State - hearsay, preservation of error
Burnett Int'l Col v. Bd of Nursing - nursing program, termination, formal hearing
Point Conversions v. Natha Govan - mandamus
Williams v. State - postconviction relief
Cook v. DOC - public records, hearing requirement
Gilbert v. State - ineffective assistance, appellate counsel
Romero v. State - sentencing
Tanner v. Tanner - marital dissolution, equitable distribution,
Global Hookah v. DBPR - tobacco, tax, Commerce Clause challenge
Ramsey v. State - competency
Kirkland v. State - probation revocation
Blue v. State - ineffective assistance, appellate counsel
Watts v. State - pro se sanctions
Cuellar v. Rubi - appellate jurisdiction, final order
Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland
212 W 18 v. Kozel - proceedings supplementary judgment, underlying decision reversal
Finlaw v. Finlaw - probate, devise, partnership agreement
Laquidara v. Houghtaling - stalking injunction, evidence
State v. Michaud - certiorari, sentencing
UATP Mgmt v. Barnes - arbitration
Villagio at Estero v. Am Cap Assur - insurance appraisal, certified conflict
Avatar P&C v. Flores - certiorari, discovery
Siesta Key Ass'n v. Sarasota - beach restoration, EPA challenge
Ranucci v. Palmetto - real property, annexation, limitations statute
Wilkinson v. Bell - contempt, parenting plan
Friedberg v. O'Doyle Rules - real property, contract, first refusal
Third District Court of Appeal - Miami
Valdes v. State - Stand Your Ground, conflict certified
Harris v. Walker - standard of review
Readon v. WPLG - dismissal with prejudice, defamation
BJ's v. Bugliaro - class certification, injunction, FDUTPA
THH v. Caceres - motion to dismiss, personal jurisdiction
FM3 Liquors v. Bien-Aime - landlord, tenant
Lubin v. State- postconviction relief
Jefferson v. State - postconviction relief
United Auto v. Gables Rehab - summary judgment
Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach
Cannon v. State - battery; burglary of conveyance
Cohen's Org v. Premier Fire - alter ego, corporate veil
Powers v. State - sentencing, DUI
Sinclair v. State - Miranda, reinitiating dialogue
Lenmar Realty v. Sun Electric - lease, rental monies, court registry
Herman v. State - expert, unpreserved error
Colarte v. State - sentencing, costs
OH v. State - delinquency; disposition order
Lafayette v. Moody - peremptory challenge, Melbourne
AE v. State - delinquency; probation, hearsay
Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach
Palmer v. Palmer - dissolution, child support, alimony
Veith v. Veith - dissolution, child support, equitable distribution
Lindberg v. Fitzgerald - certiorari, frivolousness, pro se warning
Lindberg v. Citro - certiorari, frivolousness, pro se warning
Lindberg v. Assam - certiorari, frivolousness, pro se warning
Bufford v. State - Spencer bar, pro se
The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.