Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of December 6 - 10, 2021

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Fla v. Health & Human Srvc - vaccine mandates, nationwide injunctions
Telcy v. US - habeas, First Step Act
1944 Beach Blvd v. Live Oak Banking - certified questions, Fla Supreme Court, security interests

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

MRI Assoc. v. State Farm- PIP reimbursement
Fla Bar v. Patterson - attorney discipline
In re R Reg Fla Bar & Fla R Gen Prac - amended rules, foreign attorneys

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

AC v. DCF - parental rights, termination
Blue Water v. Santa Rosa - Bert Harris Act, appraisals
Hall v. State - sentencing

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Guzman v. So Fid Ins - insurance, prompt notice
Synergy Contracting v. Fednat Ins - appraisal, payment, judgment, fees
DH v. DCF - parental rights, termination
Larson v. State - postconviction relief
Swain v. State - postconviction relief
Proino Breakfast Club v. OGI Capital - foreclosure, affirmative defenses
De La Fe v. De La Fe - shared parental responsibility
Superior Auto Glass v. GEICO - certiorari, appellate fees, conditional award
Solomon Law Group v. Dovenmuehle Mort - forum selection provision

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

People's Trust v. Progressive - insurance, mobile equipment
GR Rehab v. GEICO - appellate jurisdiction
United Auto v. I&A Med Cntr - insurance, fees, evidentiary hearing
ProntoCash v. Autoboutique - lis pendens, discharge, appellate jurisdiction
Johnson v. State - certiorari, Stand Your Ground

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Scott v. State - murder, evidence, relevancy
Katzman v. Garfinkel - settlement, third-party neutral
Boyles v. Jimenez - trustee, revocation, successor party
EA v. DCF - parental rights, termination, constitutionality
KA v. DCF - parental rights, termination, constitutionality
Cleveland v. Westport - fraudulent transfer, summary judgment

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Schrager v. State - petit theft, fines, costs
Sanchez v. Volusia Cty - summary judgment, code enforcement liens
Metra Eltrncs v. AAMP of FL - compel arbitration, patent
Innocenti v. State - Anders appeal, cost
Kovacs v. Williams - certified conflict; punitive damages, affirmative finding
Mitchell v. State - Anders appeal, scrivener's error
Taylor v. State - Spencer bar, pro se

Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.


The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.