Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of February 22 - 26, 2021
February 27, 2021

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Clark v. Ala DOC - habeas
Griffin v. Coca-Cola - ERISA
Griffin v. Delta - ERISA
Reynolds v. Behrman Cap - jurisdiction
PBT Real Estate v. Palm Bch - due process, equal protection
US v. Abovyan - healthcare fraud
US v. Harris - compassionate release
Johnson v. White - FTCA
USA v. Goldstein - securities fraud, wiretaps, variance, forfeiture

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

Emerson v. Hillsborough Cnty - charter, transportation tax, validity

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Roberts v. State - constructive possession
Holland v. State - sentencing
Dickerson v. State - postconviction relief
Gates v. State - represented pro se
State Farm v. Nordin - appraisal
Bell v. State - sentencing
D'Amico v. Connor - postconviction relief
Bradham v. State - appellate jurisdiction
Allotey v. State - pro se sanctions
Malone v. State - postconviction relief
SVI Trust v. Williams Walk CA - foreclosure, damages
Hamblen v. Pilot Trav Ctrs - "final judgment," Wrongful Death Act
Moore v. State - competency, rape shield, Williams rule, child hearsay
Mack v. State - sentencing
Kline v. Pub Def - mandamus, prerequisites
Moynihan v. State - habeas corpus
Stanton v. State - pro se sanctions
Cato v. State - postconviction relief
Reiblich v. Inch - postconviction relief
Rotella v. State - represented pro se

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Vonlydick v. State - search and seizure
5F v. Hawthorne - trespass, submerged land, dock
Demakis v. SunTrust - foreclosure, authentication
Aldamas-Gonzales v. State - probation revocation
McGee v. State - pro se sanctions
Robinson v. Sec 23 Prop OA - appellate jurisdiction

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Symonette v. State - self-representation, evidence
State v. Marin - evidence, audible recording
People's Trust v. Fernandez - insurance, appraisal
Gonzales v. Ferco - pleadings, dismissal
Phelps v. State - habeas corpus
Miami-Dade Sch Bd v. Miami Beach - sovereign immunity
Buysmart Ins v. Chirinos - certiorari, protective order
Shir Law v. Carnevale - temporary injunction
Rivera v. State Farm - demand letter, summary judgment

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Daniels v. State - DNA software
Parrish v. State - kidnapping
Zaleski v. State Farm - insurance, bad faith
Academy for Positive Learning v. Palm Beach Sch Bd - charter schools, revenue sharing
Am Integrity v. Branford - proposal for settlement
Lacey v. State - restitution, probation
Rocque v. State - contempt, hearing

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Massey Srvcs v. Sanders - non-compete, non-solicitation, non-disclosure
Precon v. Arch Insurance - statute of limitations, § 255.05(10)
Lewis v. State - Spencer warning, pro se
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.