Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of July 19 - 23, 2021
U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals
SmileDirectClub v. Battle - en banc, collateral order doctrine
St. Louis Condo Assoc v. Rockhill Ins Co. - insurance, preservation of error
US v. Dudley - ACCA, dissent
US v. Moss - en banc, ACCA mens rea element
Tarleton v. Secy Dept of Corrections - habeas, dissent
US v. Williams - sentencing
Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee
No decisions this week
First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee
Blundell v. RJ Reynolds - punitive damages, mitigation evidence
Harley v. State - jail credit
Butler v. State - sentencing
Buchanan v. DOH - administrative finality
Pierce v. State - sentencing
Addison v. DOR - Applegate affirmance
Cyrus v. Cyrus - lack of transcript
Dudowicz v. The Pearl - premises liability, dangerous condition
Hicks v. State - sentencing
Am Integrity v. Venable - certiorari, discovery, underwriting file
Gulf Coast Solar v. Busbee - ad valorem taxes, federal enclave
Scott v. Thompson - elections, home venue privilege
Patel v. Patel - timesharing
Koniz v. Lee - mandamus, legislative officer
Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland
St Petersburg v. Dorchester Hldgs - public records, cost estimate
Third District Court of Appeal - Miami
Urbach v. In re Guardianship of JRU - venue
Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach
Adamson v. RJR - Engle; spoliation; medical records
Powers v. Whitcraft - rental agreement; Residential Act
State v. Foster - § 934.03, oral communication, interception, privacy
Cousins v. Duprey - perjury, statement of belief; fraud, waiver; errata; sanctions
QBE v. United Reconstruction - insurance, assignments of benefits
Nerette v. State - competency; dismissal, misdemeanor
Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach
Grey v. Grey - dissolution, settlement agreement
Bradley v. Slyman - stalking injunction, dissolution
Turner v. State - postconviction relief, special concurrence
The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.