Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of June 21 - 25, 2021
June 25, 2021

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Belcher Pharma v. Hospira - FDCA, Lanham Act
TOT Prop v. Comm’r Int Rev - tax deduction, deed, savings clause
Hamrick v. Partsfleet - arbitration, employment contracts
Akridge v. ALFA Mut Ins - discovery, depositions, corporate management
Fedance v. Harris - securities, FLiK, limitations, fraudulent concealment
Goodloe v. Royal Caribbean - wrongful death, choice of law, maritime
S Grande View v. Alabaster - eminent domain, evidence
USA v. Henry - sentencing

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

Puzio v. State - sentencing, juveniles
Bargo v. State - capital case, direct appeal
WVMF Funding v. Palmero - foreclosure, mortgage/note conflict

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

CH v. State - delinquency
King v. DOC - inmate trust lien
Boyd v. State - belated appeal
Love v. Young - en banc denial, gender identity discrimination
Finch v. Finch - contempt
Giddens v. State - evidence, inquiring about truthfulness
Jenkins v. State - scrivener’s error

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Petterson v. State - scrivener’s error
KW v. State - search and seizure
Freeman v. Rogers - failure to appear, virtual appearance efforts
SE Concrete v. West Surety - venue, venue selection clause
Ellerson v. Moriarty - legal malpractice, elements
Thompson v. State - pro se sanctions
Ross v. State - search and seizure
Waite v. Chapman - stalking injunction, mootness
Idelson v. Carmer - parenting plan

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Cole v. Citizens - insurable interest, standing, allegations
Crawley-Kitzman v. Hernandez - complaint, sufficiency
Sports Channel v. Tabib - personal jurisdiction, forum non conveniens
Hidalgo v. Citizens - certiorari, expert discovery
TV 109 v. Turnberry Village - arbitration, injunction
State Farm v. Central Therapy - summary judgment
Axen v. Cutler Manor - eviction
Kratos v. Direct Investments - certiorari, summary judgment, immediate execution
Dupree v. Dellmar - prohibition, county court jurisdiction

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

RJR v. Kaplan - rehearing; closing argument; harmless error
Teets v. State - Richardson
Ellis v. US Bank Trust - foreclosure, attorney’s fees
Almarales v. State - closing argument, bolstering victim
Assoc in Family Practice v. Allstate - PIP, CPT codes, unbundled
State v. Stephenson - motion to vacate plea, time limit
State v. Emmanuel - speedy trial; pandemic; suspended time periods
Jenkins v. State - indirect criminal contempt, jurisdiction; dissent
Domino v. Nielsen - ratification, actual notice
Schmidt v. Schmidt - attorney’s fees, appeal, ripeness
Marquez v. Rivera - temporary injunction, stalking, continuation
Locke v. Whitehead - default judgment, motion to vacate, punitive damages
Allstate v. Katzell - PIP, reimbursement rate

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Similien v. State - sentencing error, written pronouncement
Safepoint Ins v. Hallet - summary judgment, insurance, waiver
Smith v. Fenton-Smith - dissolution, attorney’s fees
Moore v. Moore - dissolution, judgment, contempt
Cooper v. Cooper - dissolution, timesharing, parental responsibility
Peck v. Rosado - injunction, stalking; due process
LWT v. Schmidt - default judgment, vacate; small claims
Merino v. Powell - prohibition, disqualification
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.