Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of March 1 - 5, 2021
March 06, 2021

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

US v. Harris - compassionate release
Midlevelu v. ACI Info Gp - copyright infringement
Am Contractors Supply v. HD Supply - summary judgment standard
Prosper v. Martin - Daubert, qualified immunity

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

In re Rules - amended rules/forms for parental consent

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

King v. King - equitable distribution, business value, alimony
Malden v. Chase - judicial notice, prior appeal, claim preclusion
Ogden v. Mindrebo - contempt, injunction compliance
Winbar v. Morris - appellate jurisdiction, interim order trap
Williams v. State - habeas corpus, postconviction relief
Daniels v. State - collateral estoppel, postconviction relief
Appiah v. Gainesville - summary affirmance

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Phelan v. Trifactor - noncompete injunction, findings, bond
Drake v. State - involuntary commitment, right to trial
Roth v. Roth - equitable distribution, alimony
RJ Reynolds v. Durrance - Engle progeny, punitive damages, certified conflict
GS v. DCF - attorney noncompliance, bar referral

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Wright v. State - evidence, collateral crimes, hearsay
King v. Zaslavskiy - summary judgment, declaration
Suarez v. Suarez - contempt, alimony
Brown v. Miami-Dade - complaint dismissal, vexatious litigant
Geico v. MSP - prohibition, certiorari, pleading, protective order
Publix v. Miami-Dade - certiorari, zoning
Geico v. MSP - certiorari, nonparty subpoena

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Julien v. United Prop - insurance, bad faith, civil remedy notice
Point Conversions v. WPB Hotel - subject matter jurisdiction, federal issues
Roebuck v. State - sentencing, judgment, costs, fees
Aiala v. Larkin - paternity judgment, modification
Orellana v. State - sentencing
Snyder v. Meridian Park - appellate preservation
Hinners v. Hinners - replevin; temporary injunction
Calvarese v. Calvarese - marital property, equitable distribution
HAR v. DCF - parental rights, termination, default
Mallory v. Brinckerhoff - arbitration; nonfinal appeal, jurisdiction

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Gordon v. Gordon - dissolution, judgment, enforcement, jurisdiction
Rose v. Partners Federal Credit - foreclosure, conditions precedent, notice
Maali v. Maali - dissolution, child support, private school tuition
Parkin v. Eagle Home Mtg - foreclosure, summary judgment, conditions precedent
Marrero v. State - postconviction relief
Center State Transp v. Motor Trend - temporary injunction, petroleum contamination
Marrero v. Rea - certiorari, discovery, auto accident, presuit settlement
Smith v. State - Spencer bar, pro se
Wynter v. Gutierrez - domestic violence injunction
Lilja v. State - Spencer warning, pro se
Moran v. State - Spencer bar, pro se
Rhody v. Veeco Instr - default final judgment, set aside, timely appeal
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.