Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of May 3 -7, 2021

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

US v. Jackson - en banc poll, First Step Act
Foster v. US - 2255, crime of violence predicate
Sierra v. Hallandale Beach - standing
Fuqua v. Turner - qualified, sovereign immunity
Shipley v. Helping Hands Therapy - removal, remand
Travelers v. Ocean Reef Charters- maritime insurance
US v. Brown - en banc, juror removal
Broadnax v. Ala. DOC. - habeas
US v. Bryant - compassionate release
Andrews v. Biggers - sovereign immunity

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

Deviney v. State - capital case, direct appeal
Martin v. State - capital case, postconviction relief

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Devenish v. State - grand theft, value
Rizkkhalil v. State - postconviction relief
Butler v. State - mandamus, pro se with counsel
Heath v. Lee - appellate jurisdiction, timesharing order
Lynn v. Franklin Jail - habeas corpus, pro se with counsel
Carroll v. Franklin Jail - habeas corpus, pro se with counsel
Robles v. United Auto - insurance, forum selection clause
Mills v. FDLE - workers’ compensation
Arenas v. Smith - charging lien

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

SS v. State - criminal mischief
Peruchi v. State - jury instruction, justifiable deadly force
Jean v. Jean - exceptions to magistrate report, right to hearing
PDV-G v. BAV-G - timesharing, modification, magistrate findings, exceptions
Lamberson v. State - ineffective assistance, appellate counsel
Martinez v. Lobster Haven - stipulated facts, directed verdict, stacked inferences
State v. Hayes - sentencing
Estate of Quinn v. CCRC OPCO - certiorari, arbitrator selection

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Tien v. Akerman - summary judgment, tort, discovery
Hernandez v. Mishali - direct verdict, rear end collision
Rivas v. Sandoval - jury selection, for cause challenge
People’s Trust v. Amaro - breach of contract
Murphy v. State - rape shield laws, confrontation right
Shajine v. Granada - ore tenus motion, leave to amend
EDR v. Citizens - subject appraisal provision
Supermix v. Cancio - certiorari, protective order, deposition, counsel
Miami-Dade v. Snapp - second tier certiorari, due process, remedy
Mackey v. Inch - postconviction relief

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Bondar v. Jupiter Inlet - lack of prosecution
Greene v. State - identification, jail clothes
Ford v. Boynton Beach - false arrest, obstruction of justice
Woodward v. Morell - contract, statute of limitations
Wells Fargo v. Tan - foreclosure, void
Williams v. Tony - negligence
LE-1 v. Trower - discovery, certiorari

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Palmer v. HMG Venture - foreclosure, special concurrence
Jerry v. State - habitual offender sentence
Doddapaneni v. Doddapaneni - dissolution, freeze assets, pleadings

Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.


The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.