Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of November 22 - 24, 2021
U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals
US v. Grady - RFRA, sentencing
US v. Litzky - intellectual disability, sentencing
Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee
In re DCAs - recommended DCA realignment
In re Add’l Judges - additional judges
In re J Bryson - judicial discipline
First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee
No decisions so far this week.
Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland
Jones v. State - postconviction relief
Pinkston v. State - postconviction relief
Gary v. State - independent act jury instruction
Archer v. State - sentencing
Barnett v. State - sentencing, snapout forms disapproval
Hurtado v. State - postconviction relief
Happel v. State - postconviction relief
Romo v. State - leaving scene, evidence
Third District Court of Appeal - Miami
Rodriguez v. State - circumstantial evidence, certified question
OH v. APD - social program, IQ score, constitutional challenge
Duff-Esformes v. Mukamal - probate, interim expenses
Auction Co v. Russell Revoc Trust - fees, premature appeal
Namon v. Elder - probate, nonclaim statute
Watts v. State - postconviction relief
Velasquez v. Mendieta - timesharing, GAL
Sweetwater v. Pichardo - sovereign immunity
Hudson v. State - postconviction relief
Carrington Mort v. Nicolas - prohibition, contempt, perjury
Schmelzer v. Frankel - prohibition, judicial disqualification
Toirac-Aguilera v. State - pro se sanctions
Bank of Am v. Colombo - certiorari, punitive damages
Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach
Gursky v. State – competency, expert testimony
Mote Wellness v. State Farm – lack of prosecution, notice, small claims
El Brazo v. 24 Hour Air – attorney’s fees, amount, multiplier
People’s Trust Ins v. Nowroozpour – insurance, duty to repair, appraisal
Modway v. OJ Commerce – personal jurisdiction, waiver, venue clause
Cartelli v. Green – probate, objection to accounting, factual findings
Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach
No decisions so far this week.
The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.