Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of November 8 - 12, 2021
November 13, 2021

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Marrache v. Bacardi USA - class action, FDUTPA
CSX Corp. v. US - relocation benefits, RRTA
Karantsalis v. Miami Springs - ADA, limitations

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

Steiger v. State - ineffective assistance, unpreserved claims
Noetzel v. State - capital case, direct appeal

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Hicks v. State - sua sponte mistrial
Watrel v. Watrel - alimony, fees
Doss v. UPS - workers' compensation
Fla Fin Impact v. All Voters Vote - elections, citizen's initiative
Hosp East v. Hampton - workers' compensation
Smith v. State - probation revocation
UFBOT v. Carmody - certiorari, medical malpractice presuit; certified conflict

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Toth v. Miller - inequitable conduct, sanctions
Collins v. Avatar P&C - insurance, breach, premature suit
Kozma v. Advanced Surgery Ctr - certiorari, medical malpractice limitations
State v. Downs - postconviction relief
TECO v. Gansner - workers' compensation immunity
Leve v. State - postconviction relief
Harden v. State - sentencing
Gay v. Dunedin - pleadings, opportunity to amend
Blackburn v. State - probation
Crescent Shore CA v. Lani Kai - res judicata

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

12550 Biscayne CA v. NRD - summary judgment, continuance; unconscionability
Safepoint Ins v. Williams - § 768.79, settlement proposal
2275 NE 120 St v. Sanchez Struve - foreclosure, sale, vacatur, redemption
Lola v. State - pro se appeal, represented defendant
Lopez v. Cavagnuolo - § 57.105 sanctions
United Auto Ins v. ISOT Med Ctr - set-off defense
Imperial Fire & Cas v. Acosta - insurance, rescission
Montoya-Martinez v. State - concealed firearm
Locascio v. State - postconviction relief
Bruce v. State - parole
Alvarez v. Cantor - certiorari, punitive damages
SJ v. DCF - child protection, guardianship
Nelson v. State - certiorari, discovery
Thomas v. State - appellate jurisdiction
Roche v. Cyrulnik - certiorari, stay, comity
Impulsora de Productos Sustenables v. Garcia - certiorari, stay, nonviable action
Prince v. MCR Apts - appellate jurisdiction, finality

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Choate v. Rysurg - settlement, breach
DL v. State - juvenile, probation violation
Bell v. State - sentencing, substance abuse course
Progressive v. Faderani - PIP, bad faith, Medicare coding
Andersen Firm v. Brown - proposal for settlement, ambiguity
Israel v. US Bank - dissent, foreclosure, notice of default
Toyano's Auto v. Southern Auto - auto lien, bond, proper parties
First Call 24/7 v. Citizens - homeowners' insurance, appraisal
Humphrey v. State - postconviction relief

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Disney Cruise v. Martins - maritime negligence, punitives, fees
Clayton v. State - Anders appeal, voluntary plea
Essa v. Pepe - temporary parenting plan, substantial evidence
Colon v. Lindenberger - nonfinal appeal, jurisdiction
Labissiere v. State - postconviction relief
Dickerson v. State - postconviction relief
Bush v. Krisan - mandamus; trial setting, at issue
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.