Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of October 18 - 22, 2021

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Cox v. Warden - qualified immunity, 8th Amendment
McCoy v. Fla Gov - voting rights
Cheshire Bridge Holdings v. Atlanta - overbreadth, adult businesses
Gold-Fogel v. Fogel - abstention
US v. Wheeler - acquittal, prosecutorial misconduct, concurrence

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

Smith v. Inch - capital case, postconviction relief
Fla Bar re Murtha - attorney discipline
In re R Reg Fla Bar - new bar rule

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Kirksey v. State - habeas corpus
Porter v. State - pro se sanctions
Morgan v. State - pro se criminal defendant, representation

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Washington v. State - sentencing
Bayview Loan v. Brown - four corners rule, judicial notice
Capital Wealth v. Capital Wealth - commission agreement, restraint on trade
Clemann v. State - scrivener's error
Nisbett v. State - scrivener's error
Duryea v. Bono - timesharing, parental relocation, magistrate order, finality
St Pete v. Dorchester Hldgs - public records
Fason v. State - postconviction relief, sentencing, certified conflict
Miller v. State - probation revocation
Tanner v. Tanner - alimony
Nicholas v. Grant - pickup order, timesharing

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Hodgson v. State - postconviction relief
Berggren v. N Miami Bagels - rule 2.516, service
Bivins v. Douglas - trust, standing
Creative Inv v. Santibanez - lack of transcript
Powell v. Sampson - medical malpractice, presuit
Henley v. N Miami - Whistle-blower's Act
JB Pirtle Constr v. Warren Henry Auto - certiorari, lien
Ramkelawan v. Morgan & Morgan - arbitration, attorneys, bar rules
FIU v. Ramos - second-tier certiorari, student discipline
Leon Med Cntrs v. Duran - certiorari, punitive damages
Walker v. State - pro se sanctions

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Bartolone v. State - rehearing, constructive possession
Symonette v. Lozano - opportunity to amend
Precision Diagnostics v. Progressive - PIP, interest
Robinson v. State - postconviction relief
Longarzo v. Young - adoption petition,
Nadeau v. Reeves - paternity

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Friedman v. Deutsche Bank - foreclosure, fees, interest
Spring Isle v. Herme Enterprises- statute of repose
Lally v. Sandhu - valuation; fee entitlement, appellate jurisdiction
Ooten v. State - Anders appeal, probation conditions
Werner Enterprises v. Sweeney - certiorari, discovery; special concurrence
Anthony v. State - certiorari, competence
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.


The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.