Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of September 20 - 24, 2021

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

McLaurin v. Terminix - arbitration
Pelaez v. GEICO - bad faith insurance
Sosa v. Martin Cty, Fla - 1983, detention, dissent
DeJesus v. Lewis - 8th Amend., sexual assault
Beach Blitz v. Miami Beach - attorney fees
Viverette v. Soc Sec C'mr - SSI benefits
Smith v. Dozier - RLUIPA
Cutuli v. Elie - bankruptcy

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

State v. McKenzie - sentencing, sexual predators, statutory interpretation
Dailey v. State - capital case, postconviction relief

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

FYJ v. DCF - lack of transcript
Fannin v. Hunter - dog damage, directed verdict
Robinson v. State - possession
Harris v. State - plea withdrawal, sentencing
Wright v. State - judicial records, access
Global Lab Partners v. Patroni Enters - attorney disqualification
Kramer v. State - sentencing
Files v. Hayes - domestic violence injunction
Kimble v. State - sentencing
Jennings v. Fredes - cross-examination; timesharing, child support
Johnson v. State - law of case
Hagins v. Inch - prisoner discipline challenge, timing
Rich v. State - postconviction relief
JEA v. First Coast Reg Util - prohibition, regulatory jurisdiction
Hranek v. State - appellate counsel, ineffective assistance
Roberts v. State - appellate counsel, ineffective assistance
McNeil v. State - prohibition

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Carrion v. State - sentencing, preservation of error

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Arce v. State - postconviction relief
Ofer v. Bernstein - dismissal, sanction
Philip Morris v. Principe - repose, fraud
Pernas v. General Impact - dismissal, prosecution, notice
Rodriguez v. Bank of NY Mellon - eviction, stay

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Cano v. Judet - construction contract; damages
State v. Delprete - s. 817.234, insurance fraud

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Arnold v. Arnold - declaratory decree, trial jurisdiction
Heisel v. City of Deltona - simulated gambling, cease and desist
Griffis v. Bridle Oaks - injunctive relief, property
Ge v. Swearingen- HOA lien, foreclosure sale
Lifestream v. Allerton - certiorari; general negligence, med mal
Robles v. Castellanos - lack of transcript
Taylor v. State - Spencer warning, pro se

Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.


The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.