Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of August 30 - September 3, 2021

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

US v. Korf - search warrant, privilege
Varner v. Shepard - excessive force, dissent
US v. Braddy - search
Food Not Bomb v. Ft Lauderdale - First Amendment
NLG v. Horizon Hospitality Grp - bankruptcy
Underwood v. Bessemer - qualified immunity, Monell liability
Dean v. Warren - 1983, class-based animus, concurrence
Pye v. Warden, Ga Diagnostic Prison - rehearing en banc
Vinson v. Koch Foods - Batson, trial rulings

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

Furst v. DeFrances - property taxes, back assessments
Allen v. State - sentencing
In re Fla R GP&JA - amended rule, judicial pay
In re Fla R App P - amended rule, tolling motions

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Wallace v. State - denigrating defense, double jeopardy
Robinson v. State - habeas corpus
AP v. DCF - parental rights, termination
Carsten v. State - belated appeal
Levine v. State - sentencing
Washington v. State - juvenile resentencing
Owens v. State - postconviction relief
Golden v. FCOR - summary affirmance
Miles v. State - hearsay, victim's age
Westcott v. State - Stand Your Ground

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

AA v. DW - paternity, inconsistent judgment
Burke v. Kurke - alimony
Sweeney v. Washington - settlement proposal
Soto v. Carrollwood Village - § 57.105 sanctions
Friend v. State - postconviction relief
Young v. State - probation revocation
Nunez v. State - postconviction relief

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Giller v. Grossman - estate, trust
Martinez-Olson v. Olson - marital settlement, death benefit, waiver
United v. Stand-Up MRI - summary judgment, waiver
GFA Int'l v. Trillas - temporary injunction, covenant not to compete
Casner v. Fury Mgmt - prohibition, disqualify trial judge
Temnikova v. Eastern Fin - foreclosure, interest

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Williams-Paris v. Joseph - prenuptial agreement, choice of law
Alahad v. State - eyewitness identification, "show-up"
State v. Piering - nolle prosequi; improper purpose
Mortgage Assets Mgmt v. Kaplan - equitable lien, superiority
Lorber v. Passick - home sale, inducement, misrepresentation
Graham v. Virgil - forum non conveniens
MP v. DCF - parental rights

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Curvey v. Avante Group - temporary injunction; speech, prior restraint
Moore v. Moore - marital settlement agreement
Chiu v. Adams - permanent injunction, stalking
Barton v. State- certiorari, competency, irreparable harm
Poole v. State - Anders appeal, costs
Woods v. State - Spencer bar, pro se
Brown v. State - Spencer bar, pro se

Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.


The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.