Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of September 6 - 10, 2021

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Tillis v. Brown - excessive force, dissent
Farah v. US AG - removal, dissent
Talamantes-Enriquez v. US AG - removal

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

Alcegaire v. State - capital case, direct appeal
CCM CA v. Petri Positive Pest - § 768.79, settlement proposals
In re Fla R Juv P - amended form
In re R Reg Fla Bar - amended rule, ads

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Hall v. State - entrapment
State v. King - postconviction relief
Comm'y Power Net v. JEA - solar power, credits, challenge, standing

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Omega Title v. Butschky - certiorari, punitive damages
Fla Citz Alliance v. Collier Sch Bd - public schools, textbooks, challenge, Sunshine Law
Custom Design v. Synergy Rents - breach of contract, open account
Naples Estates v. Muston - rent, waiver, estoppel
Advanta IRA v. FTE - summary judgment, standard, residential sale proceeds

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

De Los Angeles v. Winn-Dixie - slip and fall, summary judgment
Alvarez v. Acosta- new trial, motorcycle crash
TSG Delaware v. Dictan - personal jurisdiction
Star Casualty v. Gables - settlement agrmt, latent ambiguity
Garcia v. Ins Exchange of Am - arbitration waiver
Elo v. Liberty Leasing - confession of error, due process
G4S Secure v. N.L. - certiorari, lack of jurisdiction
Mitchell v. State - postconviction relief

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Rhiner v. Koyama - med malpractice, pre-suit
Parrish v. State - kidnapping, Faison analysis
Boyles v. Jimenez - probate, removal of trustee
Kocik v. Rodriguez - additur, pain and suffering
Ruckdeschel v. People's Trust Ins - specific performance
Torres v. Bank of NY - foreclosure; attorney's fees

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Simpson v. State - investigative costs, sentencing error
Ager v. Berger - modification, foreign paternity judgment
RJ Reynolds v. Frost - venue, transfer
Hands On Chiro v. GEICO - certiorari, PIP reimbursement
Shant Wellness v. GEICO- certiorari, PIP reimbursement
Health Plus Chiro v. GEICO - certiorari, PIP reimbursement
Express Care v. GEICO - certiorari, PIP reimbursement
Preziosi v. GEICO - certiorari, PIP reimbursement
Velocity v. GEICO - certiorari, PIP reimbursement
Hands On Chiro v. GEICO - certiorari, PIP reimbursement
Preziosi v. GEICO - certiorari, PIP reimbursement
Preziosi v. GEICO - certiorari, PIP reimbursement
Preziosi v. GEICO - certiorari, PIP reimbursement
Rose Healthcare v. GEICO - certiorari, PIP reimbursement
Preziosi v. GEICO - certiorari, PIP reimbursement
Ashley Park v. GEICO - certiorari, PIP reimbursement
Rumley v. GEICO - certiorari, PIP reimbursement
Keen v. Jennings - certiorari, punitive damages, amendment
Katwaroo v. State- postconviction relief
Walker v. State - sentence, concession of error
Martinez v. State - sentence

Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.


The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.