Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of April 25 - 29, 2022
U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals
US v. Thomas - sentencing
US v. Clark - Brady, suppression, trial rulings
Johnson v. Fla - exhaustion, abstention
Djadju v. Vega - mootness, habeas, immigration
Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee
Pittman v. State - capital case, postconviction relief
Dial v. Calusa Palms - Medicare benefits, evidence, past expenses
First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee
DSK Grp v. Zurich - workers’ compensation
Toyens v. State - statutory rape
Jackson v. State - habeas corpus, unauthorized
Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland
Petro Welt v. Brinkmann - certiorari, corporate depositions, apex
Zetrouer v. State - drug possession
Edmonds v. State - sentencing
AS v. State - adjudicatory hearing, Zoom, necessity
Addit v. Estate of Ingolia - arbitration, unconscionability, severability
Third District Court of Appeal - Miami
Plastiquim v. Odebrecht Constr - fraud, conspiracy, RICO
United Auto Ins v. Health Care Family Rehab - attorney’s fees, findings
Chess v. Sweeney - fraud on the court, monetary sanctions
Milian v. State - postconviction relief
Ross-Williams v. Leali - receivership, scope, proceedings supplementary
Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach
Lopez v. MGA Ins - pre- and post-judgment interest, waiver
Sikich v. State - sentencing
Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach
Harrell v. State - postconviction relief
Crenshaw v. State - Anders appeal, scrivener’s error
Giddens v. State - Anders appeal, cost
Guardian Ad Litem Program v. Campbell - certiorari; custody transfer
LM v. DCF - dependency, sufficient evidence
The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.