Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of April 25 - 29, 2022

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

US v. Thomas - sentencing
US v. Clark - Brady, suppression, trial rulings
Johnson v. Fla - exhaustion, abstention
Djadju v. Vega - mootness, habeas, immigration

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

Pittman v. State - capital case, postconviction relief
Dial v. Calusa Palms - Medicare benefits, evidence, past expenses

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

DSK Grp v. Zurich - workers’ compensation
Toyens v. State - statutory rape
Jackson v. State - habeas corpus, unauthorized

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Petro Welt v. Brinkmann - certiorari, corporate depositions, apex
Zetrouer v. State - drug possession
Edmonds v. State - sentencing
AS v. State - adjudicatory hearing, Zoom, necessity
Addit v. Estate of Ingolia - arbitration, unconscionability, severability

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Plastiquim v. Odebrecht Constr - fraud, conspiracy, RICO
United Auto Ins v. Health Care Family Rehab - attorney’s fees, findings
Chess v. Sweeney - fraud on the court, monetary sanctions
Milian v. State - postconviction relief
Ross-Williams v. Leali - receivership, scope, proceedings supplementary

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Lopez v. MGA Ins - pre- and post-judgment interest, waiver
Sikich v. State - sentencing

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Harrell v. State - postconviction relief
Crenshaw v. State - Anders appeal, scrivener’s error
Giddens v. State - Anders appeal, cost
Guardian Ad Litem Program v. Campbell - certiorari; custody transfer
LM v. DCF - dependency, sufficient evidence

Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.


The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.