Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of February 14 - 18, 2022

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

US v. Williams - sentence reduction, First Step Act
MidAmerica C2L v. Siemens Energy - expert testimony, leave to amend, new trial
US v. Dennis - notice, revocation of probation
US v. Campbell - en banc, search and seizure, good faith, issue waiver or forfeiture
Pincus v. American Traffic Solutions - unjust enrichment
Parks v. BitConnect Int'l PLC - securities, solicitation
US v. Dupree - en ban poll, vacating this unpublished opinion
Del Castillo v. Sec FDOH - First Amendment, nutrition licensing

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

Fla Bar v. Schwartz - attorney discipline
In re R Reg Fla Bar - unlicensed attorney, remote work from Fla

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Berrane v. State - self-defense, deadly force instruction, reputation
Vickery v. Pensacola - injunction, tree removal, historic tree
Silberberg v. Palm Bch Sch Bd - workers' compensation
Daniels v. Riggien - First Amendment, qualified immunity
Demichael v. DMS - retirement benefits, capacity, spousal acknowledgment
First Call 24/7 v. Citizens - insurance appraisal
State v. Kahl - sentencing
Running Cars v. Miller - arbitration, waiver
State v. KF - search and seizure
Terra Mar Prop Mgmt v. Wilmington Sav Fund Soc - foreclosure, limitations
White v. State - postconviction relief
Carroll v. Dixon - postconviction relief
Orndorff v. State - ineffective assistance, appellate counsel
Forrester v. State - ineffective assistance, appellate counsel
PR v. DCF - parental rights, termination

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Stallings v. Bernard - stalking injunction
Cossio v. Marceno - habeas corpus, no-contact orders
Seiracki v. State - resisting officer without violence
Tampa Park v. Andrews - certiorari, nonparty financial information

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Aledda v. State - evidence, witness training
Arbelaez v. Ortiz - service of process
Miami Lakes v. Miami-Dade - road transfer, contract breach
Calafell v. State - postconviction relief
Ferguson v. Trinidad & Tabago - certiorari, corporate representative
Am Mobile Health v. State Farm - PIP, reasonable amount
United Auto v. Millennium Radiology - PIP, collateral estoppel
Selman v. Progressive - settlement enforcement, postjudgment jurisdiction
8425 Biscayne v. Pinnacle Towers - real property, restrictive easement
Harris v. HGA-Land - Applegate affirmance
United Auto v. Millennium Radiology - PIP, collateral estoppel
Marsh v. Gallagher Risk Mgmt - administrative challenge, waiver
State v. Gutierrez - probation violation
Ridard v. Massa Inv Grp - arbitration
El Mallakh v. Belgium Inv - default judgment, vacatur
Melkonian v. Code Enforce - lack of prosecution
Innova Inv v. Rolle - pleadings, leave to amend
LK Hotel v. 1512 One Co - appellate jurisdiction
Curry v. State - postconviction relief
Belmondo v. Amisal - temporary injunction, defamation, prior restraint
Hodge v. Babcock - certiorari, child pickup order
Arslanian v. Junior - habeas corpus

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Tower Hill v. Kushch - proposal for settlement, ambiguity
Geovera v. Glasser - insurance, water damage
McRoberts v. State - self-incrimination, cell phone PIN
DHBH Atlantic v. Delray Beach - Bert J. Harris Act, pre-requisites
Silvas v. Silvas - marital dissolution, constructive trust
Chatten v. Chatten - marital dissolution, nonmarital property
JG Contracting v. Tower Innov - default judgment, personal jurisdiction
Garson v. State - Spencer sanctions
Paris v. State - sentencing, supervision cost
Projekt Prop Resto v. Citizens - insurance, water leak, experts
Belanger v. Belanger - marital dissolution, continuance
Sandoval v. State - probation order, jurisdiction
State v. Fox - preservation of error
Briggs v. State - withdrawal of plea, sentencing

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Santiago v. Wilmington Trust - constructive service, default, foreclosure
Security First Ins v. Vazquez - insurance, limitation of liability
Rivas v. State - battery, mistrial, comment on right to remain silent
McKnight v. State - subpoena, medical evidence, relevance
Sesler v. State - Spencer warning, pro se
Kitchen v. State - sentence
Kelly v. State - sentence, lack of remorse

Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.


The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.