Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of January 17 - 21, 2022

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

McClendon v. Long - compelled speech, First Amendment sex offenders
Vital Pharmaceuticals v Alfieri - mootness, restrictive covenants, concurrence
US v. Garcon - en banc rehearing grant, vacating this sentencing decision

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

Avsenew v. State - capital case, direct appeal
Jackson v. State - capital case, postconviction relief

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Philip Morris v. Jordan - attorney's fees, rate, Engle progeny
Brown v. State - postconviction relief
Woods v. State - habeas corpus
Johns v. State - habeas corpus, pro se sanctions
Boatman v. State - judicial disqualification
In re Doe 22-A - abortion, parental consent waiver

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Brewster v. State - pro se sanctions
Blount v. State - postconviction relief
Haskell v. Haskell - marital dissolution, fees
Hobdy v. State - postconviction relief
Solomon v. State - postconviction relief
Miller v. State - postconviction relief
JTK v. DOR - child support
Sarasota Cnty v. So Underground - construction contract, damages
Gillespie v. Holdsworth - imputed income
Allstate v. Ray - certiorari, work product, in camera inspection
In re Doe - abortion, parental consent waiver

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

de Oca v. Citizens - insurance coverage, trial result
Alonso-Llamazares v. Int'l Dermotology - employment, non-compete, injunction
Riano v. Bank of Am - foreclosure, loan modification
Valledor v. Decky - appellate jurisdiction, final order
BMC Southwood v. Monochelli - arbitration, condo dispute
Amersham Enters v. Hakim-Daccach - personal jurisdiction, forum non conveniens
IMC Grp v. Outar Inv - specific performance, intervention, lack of transcript
Campbell v. Harper's Air - release, scope
Pringle v. Pringle - alimony, equitable distribution
Miami v. Bencomo - settlement proposal, nominal offer, good faith
Brooks v. Henry - legal malpractice fraud claim
Minner v. State - certiorari, imputed disqualification, counsel
ZDS Constr v. Perez - certiorari, order contemplating future order
Bailey v. State - certiorari, Stand Your Ground

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Bak v. Bak - domestic violation injunction, dissolution
Ahern v. Leon - stalking injunction
Kram v. Safeco - venue

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Poveromo v. Poveromo - dissolution, imputed income; appellate preservation
McIntosh Fish Camp v. Colwell - summary judgment, foreclosure, fraud defense
Dumigan v. Holmes Regl Med Ctr - directed verdict, negligence
Cowan v. Gray - certiorari, handwritten notes, deposition preparation
Hill v. State - postconviction relief

Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.


The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.