Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of January 31 - February 4, 2022

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

US v. Hardwick - restitution, ex post facto, sentencing
Cavalieri v. Avior Airlines - preemption, diversity, CAFA
Jackson Nat'l Life Ins v. Crum - certified question (Ga. Supreme Ct.), illegal wagering life insurance contract
TR v. Lamar Cty Bd of Ed - qualified immunity, search, invasion of privacy, outrage
Southern Coal v. Drummond Coal Sales - price escalation clauses, attorney fees, contract breach, concurrence

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

Bell v. State - capital case, direct appeal
Pincus v. Am Traffic Sol - red light cameras, unjust enrichment
In re Fla R Juv P - amended rules
Booker v. State - capital case, postconviction relief

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Mastandrea v. Snow - defamation, actual malice
Bilus v. State - postconviction relief
Lowitz v. S Ala Brick - certiorari, mental health records
Baltodano v. Baltodano - appellate jurisdiction, nonfinal order, rehearing
Williams v. State - habeas corpus, pro se sanctions

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

KT v. State - criminal restitution
DL v. DCF - parental rights, termination
Santos v. Bartoletta - dating violence injunction
Moret v. State - scrivener's error, sentencing

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

RJ Reynolds v. Gloger - Engle progeny, jury selection, expert cross-exam
Allstate v. Bank of Am - service of process, waiver of challenge
Apollo v. BNP - proceedings supplementary, personal jurisdiction, Ocean's Eleven-like
RAV Bahamas v. Marlin Three - pure bill of discovery
Ortiz v. Ortiz - equitable distribution, alimony
VT v. Liberty Dental - Medicaid, fair hearing
Santiexposito v. State - postconviction relief
Handte v. Monroe Cnty - second-tier certiorari, land use, vacation rentals
Manetta v. State - postconviction relief
Penalver v. State - certiorari, Stand Your Ground
Tower Imaging v. State Farm - forum non conveniens, confession of error
Penrod v. Aleman - certiorari, trial court stay
Song v. State - prohibition, judicial disqualification

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Love v. State - grand theft, restitution
Sanders v. State - rehearing; sentencing
NYC Const v. Jerome - rule 1.540(b), excusable neglect
Schulte v. Bank of NY Mellon - service of process, waiver
Broward v. Manarite - sovereign immunity, rule 9.130
AR v. DCF - parental rights, termination

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Brevard Clerk v. Brevard Bd of Cnty Commrs - declaratory relief; tax revenues, ad valorem
Trident Asset Mgmt v. 2050 Condotel - foreclosure; safe harbor, § 718.116(1)(b)
Dalton v. State - probation violation, sentence
Graham v. Graham - dismissal, jurisdiction
Maleckar v. State - battery; Anders, cost
Utile v. State - Spencer warning, pro se

Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.


The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.