Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of July 18 - 22, 2022
July 22, 2022

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Coleman v. Hillsborough Cnty - sovereign immunity
Dacostagomez-Aguilar v. US Att’y Gen - removal
Jacob v. Mentor Worldwide - preemption
Kassa v. Fulton Cnty - prosecutorial immunity
MSP Recovery v. Metro Gen Ins Co - Medicare Secondary Payer Act
Otto v. City of Boca Raton - en banc denial, First Amendment, dissent
Auriga Polymers Inc v. PMCM2 LLC - bankruptcy, new value defense
SisterSong v. Gov. State of Ga - reproductive rights
Stansell v. Bello - Rule 60, damages
Tecnicas v. SSK - arbitration

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

No decisions this week

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

State v. Planned Parenthood - abortion, automatic stay, pass-through
Webster v. Tally Mem’l Healthcare - limitations, contract
Swift v. State - Stand Your Ground
US Bank v. Qadir - foreclosure, unclean hands
Barnett v. Hibiscus HA - real property, architectural review committee
Baptiste v. Sunrise Comm’y - workers’ compensation
Robinson v. State - mandamus, clear right
King v. State - ineffective assistance, appellate counsel

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

No decisions this week.

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

State v. Woodruff - postconviction relief
KM v. State - juvenile, remote testimony
Star v. Gables Ins - PIP coverage, summary judgment, affidavit, defenses
USAA v. Less Instit - PIP coverage, exhaustion of benefits
Farber v. State - sex offender registration
Water Restoration Guys v. Citizens - insurance, failure to comply
State v. Mayes - carrying concealed firearm
Miami Gardens v. N Miami Bch - water utility, charges, sovereign immunity
Passariello v. Bank of NY - foreclosure, conclusory affidavit
Navarro v. Varela - arbitration
Auto Club v. Santee - appraisal
Roberts v. Diaz - timesharing, lack of transcript
Malek v. Malek - arbitration
Becker v. Becker - service of process
NexusVC v. Hieg Part - certiorari, customer lists; prohibition, judicial disqualification
Horne v. State - summary affirmance
Mich Auto Sales v. 14004 NW 19th - prohibition, postjudgment pleadings amendment

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Perera v. Genovese - arbitration, scope of power
Massey v. Thomas - dismissal, administrative order

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

USAA v. Mikrogiannakis - § 627.736(5)(c), PIP invoices
Harmon Parker v. Santek Mgmt - judgment, add party
Kidwell Grp v. Olympus Ins - § 627.7152, retroactivity
Baker v. State - withdraw plea, conflict-free counsel
Williams v. State - confession of error, competency hearing
Warren v. State - Spencer warning, pro se
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2025 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.