Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of July 4 - 8, 2022

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Daye v. US Att’y Gen - immigration, removal
US v. Cohen - Fourth Amendment standing
Royal Palm v. Pink Palm - prevailing party fees

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

Duke Energy v. Clark - utility, costs
Fletcher v. State - capital case, direct appeal

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

RJ Reynolds v. Harris - Engle progeny, punitive damages
Murphy v. Murphy - personal jurisdiction
Hatcher v. State - search and seizure
Nationstar v. DeSouza - foreclosure, fees, appellate jurisdiction

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Bass Venture v. Devom - lost profits, evidence
Joy v. Oaks Club - real property, declaration, estoppel
Jackson v. State - postconviction relief
Hudson Cap v. Iecho - personal jurisdiction
EM v. EG - timesharing, visitation

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Perez v. Citizens - insurance, summary judgment, conclusory affidavit
Thompson v. Thompson - mandamus, county court, subject matter jurisdiction
United Auto v. Cent Therapy - insurance, PIP, physician recordkeeping
Corredor v. Nichols - judgment against nonparty
Citron v. HGC Auto Collision - auto repairs, lien hearing

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Maroone Chevrolet v. Alvarado - FDUTPA, diminution
SI v. State - corpus delicti objection
Hormaeche v. State - excessive speed, vehicular homicide

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Felicetti Law v. de Jesus - charging lien, strike, sanction
Wasden v. State - Anders appeal, cost
Cummings v. Cummings - dissolution; fee entitlement, appellate jurisdiction
McCone v. Pitney Bowes - certiorari; pro se representation
Massie v. State - Spencer bar, pro se
Duffy v. State - ineffective assistance, appellate
Winters v. State - postconviction relief
Beacon Park v. Eagle Vista - certiorari; legal invoices, privilege

Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.


The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.