Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of June 20 - 24, 2022
June 25, 2022

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Dep't of Labor v. TECO - OSHA
Banks v. HHS Sec - standing
Fuerst v. Atlanta Housing Auth - NDAA, retaliation

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

Thompson v. State - postconviction relief, intellectual disability

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

DW v. DCF - dependency
Main Street Entm't v. Guardianship of Faircloth - certified question, comparative fault, dram shop
Vickery v. Pensacola - injunction, tree removal, certification concerns
State v. Bryant - criminal restitution
Manuel v. State - sentencing
Lynch v. State - preservation of error
Berry v. State - scrivener's error
Diamond v. State - competency
Johnson v. Trend Offset Printing - summary affirmance
Petrovski v. Petrovski - timesharing, child support
Rivera v. State - jail credit, preservation of error
Butts v. State - represented pro se litigant

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Chapman v. State - probation revocation, mootness
DJS v. State - scrivener's error
Homeward Real Estate v. Shoubaki - real property, contract, commission
Al Andary v. Walsh - certiorari, presuit, expert opinion
Robinson Helicopter v. Estate of Gangapersaud - personal jurisdiction
Gant v. State - probation revocation

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Andraesen v. Klein Glasser - wrongful death, duty, legal malpractice
Sacramento v. Citizens - summary judgment, premature, pending discovery
Chantilly Condo v. Hellas Eng'g - contract, breach, damages
Tallo v. illes - certiorari, postjudgment discovery
Ramos v. Bastos - dog bite, liability
Citizens v. Dasaro Enter - insurance, emergency mitigation limit
Pineside Condo v. Rey - appellate jurisdiction
Miami v. Cruz - sovereign immunity
Curry v. State - postconviction relief

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Petrinic v. Petrinic - dissolution, scrivener's error
Hernandez v. Mendoza - dissolution, parenting plan
Pierre v. Am Security Ins - en banc, dismissal
Total MD v. Geico - venue
Karishma v. Hoffmann - apex doctrine, affidavit
AT v. State - juvenile, home detention

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach


Lexington Place v. Flint- declaration of condo, arbitration
Charles v. State - Spencer bar, pro se
Kelley v. State - child neglect, judgment of acquittal
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.