Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of June 6 - 10, 2022
June 11, 2022

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Dukes v. Cincinnati Ins Co. - COVID insurance coverage, Ala law
Flores-Alonso v. US Att'y Gen - removal, immigration
Caplan v. All-American Auto Collision - ADA att'y fees
Ga Ass'n of Latino Elected Officials v. Gwinnett Cnty - voting rights
Johnston v. Borders - due process, defamation, concurrences
McKay v. Miami-Dade Cnty - FLSA, concurrence
US v. Jackson - ACCA, sentencing
Dorman v. Chaplains Office BSO - RLUIPA

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

Ritchie v. State - capital case, direct appeal

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

DOC v. Gould - gain time, mandamus, en banc
JB v. DCF - dismissal, failure to prosecute appeal
Harrison v. DMS ­- pleadings, amendments; insurers, bad faith claim
APD v. Meadowview - APA, attorney's fees, ALJ jurisdiction
Preston v. State - postconviction discovery
Pretell v. State - capital sexual battery
Wilridge v. State - mandamus, mootness
Long v. DOC - belated appeal, civil case
Lancaster v. State - represented pro se petitioner
Barnes v. State - certiorari, competency, written order

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Hull v. State - sexual offender registration, statutory interpretation, amendment
Adams v. Adams - equitable distribution, alimony, fees
Miles v. State - sentencing
Philips v. State - postconviction relief
Mobley v. State - attorney sanctions

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

1000 Brickell v. Miami- real property, dedication, use, reversion
Buset v. HSBC - appellate sanctions
Buck v. Global Fidelity - venue, forum selection clause
Antunes v. de Oliveira - contempt, marital settlement agreement
Doral Collision Cntr v. Daimler Trust - motor vehicle repair, lien, unjust enrichment
Brooks v. Brooks - rule 1.540(b)
Crimson 27 v. Taylor Made Lending - foreclosure, vacatur, unliquidated damages

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Abraham v. State - sentencing, scoresheet
Tinker v. State - fraud, legal sufficiency
Tinker v. State - signature ID, evidence in deliberation
Trottman v. State - statutory maximum
100 Emerald Beach v. Thornton - contempt, nonfinal appeal, certified conflict
Philip Morris v. Cohen - sanctions, attorney's fees
Cayard v. US Bank - foreclosure, payment history
Kogel v. State - Baker Act, harm
Frownfelter v. Frownfelter - dissolution, attorney's fees
Meisels v. Dobrofsky - summary judgment, response
Lewis v. Max Granite - small claims limit
LS v. State - delinquency, plea
Conover v. State - mandamus, immunity

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

State v. Redhead - suppression, good faith exception, warrant
Webb v. State - Anders appeal, scrivener's error
Vazquez-Arroyo v. Garcia - child support modification, concession of error
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.