Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of March 14 - 18, 2022

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Crosley v. DOC - habeas, dissent
Lauture v. US AG - removal
Brasil v. Sec'y DHS - immigration, subject matter jurisdiction
Compre v. Nusret Miami - FLSA, tips

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

Thourtman v. Junior - bail
Prentice v. RJ Reynolds - Engle progeny, fraud, reliance
Lorusso v. State - pro se sanctions
State v. Johnson - vehicle crash, flight from scene, double jeopardy

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Fletcher v. State - involuntary plea
Santiago v. SBA Comm'n - workers' compensation
Cosmian v. State - written opinion request granted
Labrake v. Labrake - domestic violence injunction
Lakin v. Hernando Cnty Sheriff - workers' compensation
Kelly Air v. Amtrust N Am - workers' compensation
Murphy v. Murphy - marital dissolution, life insurance
Southerland v. State - probation revocation
Colville v. State - mandamus, duty to rule, mootness
Ross v. State - postconviction relief
Simmons v. State - postconviction relief
Lynch v. State - postconviction relief
Buck v. State - postconviction relief
Doukas v. Doukas - untimely nonfinal appeal

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

TH v. State - delinquency, Zoom hearing, constitutional challenges
Robles v. State - plea withdrawal
Goetz v. AGB Tampa - foreclosure, surplus funds
KE v. DCF - parental rights, termination
Gordineer v. State - certiorari, public defender, conflict
Williams v. State Farm - bad faith, appraisal, cure
Harris v. Tiner - settlement proposal

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Singletary v. State - sentencing
HJC v. Gallardo - personal jurisdiction
Aventura v. Miami-Dade Sch Bd - charter schools, referendum, revenue sharing
Morales v. Citizens - insurance, hurricane coverage, summary judgment
Bacinello v. Admiral Marine - personal jurisdiction
Swedberg v. Goldfinger's - likeness, misappropriation, limitations, single publication rule
Schneer v. Llaurado - paternity, custody
Bank of NY v. Bontoux - sanctions, appellate counsel, improper conduct
Hammocks CA v. State - certiorari, discovery
Nicolas v. State - postconviction relief
Bank of Am v. Bank of NY - certiorari, trade secrets, in camera review
Roberson v. Junior - habeas corpus

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

RJR v. Kaplan - on remand, punitive damages
RJR v. Mattson - on remand, punitive damages
Wiggins v. Brightview - default, coding error
Dillard v. First Prot Ins - insurance, statutory attorney's fees
Narvaez v. State - sentencing
Parbeen v. Bari - marital dissolution, prenuptial agreement
Allstate v. Richards - PIP benefits, ripeness, deductible

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Rodriguez v. State - Anders appeal, drug offender probation
Dalton v. State - probation violation, original sentence
Howard v. State - ineffective assistance, trial; new evidence
Rollins v. Rollins - injunction for protection, sexual violence
Shea v. State - Spencer warning, pro se
Hastings v. State - belated appeal, factual dispute, commissioner
OC Food v. Orange County - ordinance, Florida Civil Rights Act, conflict
Perez v. State - habeas corpus, direct criminal contempt

Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.