Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of March 21 - 25, 2022

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Keister v. Bell - First Amendment, public form
Doe v Samford Univ - Title IX, pseudonyms, concurrence
Said v US Att'y Gen - cancellation of removal
US v Lee - double jeopardy

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

In re Fla Fam L R Pro - amended rules
In re Fla Fam L R Pro - amended forms
In re Fla Fam L R Pro - another amended rule
Rivera v. Dixon - pro se sanctions
Tribeca Asset Mgmt v. Ancla Int'l - contract, choice of law, forum selection
In re Fla R Crim Pro - amended scoresheet

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Hollings v. State - inconsistent verdict
Hooks v. State - sentencing
Gainesville v. Comm'n Workers - arbitration, vacatur, misconduct, finality
Rea-Manna v. Manna - alimony, equitable distribution
Porras v. Univ of Fla - administrative, residency, in-state tuition

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

State v. Fernandez - en banc, search and seizure, standing; certified conflict
Taneja v. Downtown St Pete Props - mandate enforcement, amended pleadings
NM Residential v. Prospect Park - fraud, representation disclaimer
Derrick v. State - best evidence rule, restitution
Thomas v. State - probation revocation
Cook v. State - probation revocation
Smith v. State - mandamus, public records
Padmore v. Padmore - equitable distribution, alimony
Edwards v. State - probation revocation

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

St Juste v. State - Richardson hearing
Progressive Am v. Columna - insurance, PIP recovery
Red Diamond Med v. Progressive Am - insurance, condition precedent, confession
Lee Mem'l v. Martinez - venue
LaFlippe v. State - postconviction relief
KD v. In re PP - UCCJEA
Cebez v. Junior - habeas corpus

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Vargas v. Gosine - final order, dismissal
All Ins Restoration v. Am Integrity Ins - insurance benefits, homestead
Rafferty v. Martin Memorial - medical negligence, corroboration
Forte v. All County Towing - evidentiary hearing, fee amount
Walsh v. Abate - specific performance, statute of frauds
Miami Open MRI v. Liberty Mutual - venue, dismissal
In re: Change of Name - change of name
Dorvilien v. Verty - child support
Fla Water & Mold v. Am Integrity Ins - leave to amend
Daniel v. State - sentencing, manifest injustice

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

State Farm v. Davis - damages, aggravation of preexisting injury
GEICO v. Affinity Healthcare - PIP benefits, reimbursement limitations
Jimenez v. Aviles - § 57.105, safe harbor
Turner v. State - ineffective assistance, trial
Oropeza v. State - Anders appeal, cost
Haskell v. State - postconviction relief
Simmons v. State - Anders appeal, cost
Porter v. State - ineffective assistance, appellate
Nelson v. Mirra - child custody

Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.