Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of May 30 - June 3, 2022

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Henry's La Grill v. Allied Ins - insurance, Covid
Cochran v. Penn Mut Life Ins - class action, securities
US v. Stines - sentencing

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

State v. Burns - sentencing
Fla Bar v. Regan - bar discipline
In re R Reg Fla Bar - amended bar rules
In re R Reg Fla Bar - amended bar rule, not-for profit service, comments open
Black Voters Matter v. Byrd - all writs, injunction, redistricting

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Hayes v. State - collateral crimes, identification
Richardson v. State - collateral crimes, identification
Lowe v. State - sentencing
Fla Environ Reg Spec v. DEP - contract, termination; open meetings
Lovett v. State - probation violation
Stevens v. Stevens - constructive trust, insurance, preemption
Sargent v. Bradford Cnty Sheriff - workers' compensation
Heritage P&C v. Williams - insurance, appraisal

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Melendez v. State - sentencing
Bourdeau v. State - probation revocation
US Bank v. Martinez - foreclosure, lost note
Wagner v. State - judicial disqualification
Freeman v. State -postconviction relief
Marcus v. State - probation revocation
USF v. Moore - sovereign immunity

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Jean-Marie v. State - RICO, limitations
Pozanco v. FJB 6501 - premises liability, swimming pool
Fernandez v. Cruz - res judicata, estoppel
God's Blessing v. Salas - maintenance and cure, interim award, procedure

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Masiello v. State - pro se withdraw of plea, conflict-free counsel
O'Boyle v. Gulf Stream - public records, attorney's fees, appearance
Marquez v. State - confession of error, sentencing, repeal of ordinance
O'Boyle v. Gulf Stream - public records, expert costs, attorney's fees
Gesten v. American Strategic Ins - insurance, inspection, video/audio recording
Inlet Colony v. Martindale - real estate sales contract, closing date, lis pendens
Dixon v. Fednat Ins - pro se, order to retain new counsel, dismissal, sanction

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Orlando Bar Grp v. DeSantis - rehearing; COVID-19 orders, inverse condemnation
Am Coastal Ins v. Villas of Suntree HOA - compel appraisal, coverage determination
Lentino v. McKinney - injunction for protection, evidence
Jabri v. State - admission, authentication
Lemon v. PTIC - insurance, accord and satisfaction
Polite v. State - Anders appeal, scrivener's error
Oddo v. Oddo - child timesharing, parent psych evaluation
Loyd v. State - Spencer warning, pro se
Isom v. State - postconviction relief

Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.


The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.