Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of May 9 - 13, 2022
U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals
US v. Moon - search, public access to trial
Morales v. US Att’y Gen - asylum
US v. Rodriguez - sentencing
Gulisano v. Burlington - sanctions
Global v. Republic - FSIA jurisdiction
Priva v. US Att’y Gen - right to counsel, immigration, dissent
Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee
In re Fla R GP&JA - amended rule, temporary judicial assignments
First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee
REC v. DCF - mootness
Kirk v. State - sentencing
State Farm v. Neurology Partner - motion for remand
Ford Motor Credit v. Parks - illegible evidence
Hernandez v. Warsinske - appellate jurisdiction, settlement agreement
Hardin v. Heyl Truck Lines - prohibition
Sanders v. State - habeas corpus
Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland
Lee Cnty Clerk v. Gavidia - foreclosure, clerk’s registry, fee return
Lorusso v. State - Anders duties, appellate counsel
O’Connell v. State - return of property
Davis v. Mishiyev - certiorari, defamation, anti-SLAPP, certified conflict
Nugent v. State - postconviction relief
Third District Court of Appeal - Miami
Wallace v. Torres-Rodriguez - probate, fraudulent transfers, constructive trust
Matthiesen v. In re Estate of Masri - probate, fees
Commodore v. Lloyd’s London - insurance, Covid-19, business losses
Amersham Enters v. Hakim-Daccach - arbitration
Dexx Med v. Fitesa Naotecidos - appellate jurisdiction, personal jurisdiction
Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach
JUUL v. Feldman - protective order, relevance
Philip Morris v. Rintoul - punitive damages, corporate veil, marital consortium
Moquin v. Bergeron - dissolution, choice of law
Wolfe v. 224 Via Marila - contract, substantial compliance
Graham v. State - counterfeit substance, sale
Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach
Am Coastal Ins v. Marina Isles - appraisal, service
Richman v. Calzaretta - attorney’s fees, garnishment
Merriman v. Adler - attorney’s fees, findings
Corbett v. State - prohibition, stand your ground, burden
Dept Corrections v. Robles - certiorari, visitation
The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.