Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of February 27 - March 3, 2023
March 03, 2023

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Leonard v Ala Bd of Pharmacy - abstention
McAlpin v. Town of Sneads - retaliation
Nealy v Warner Chappel Music - copyright
US v Turner - expert opinion, harmless error, dissent

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

AC v. DCF - pro se sanctions
In re Fam L Forms - new forms

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Williams v. State - belated appeal
Barrs v. State - mandamus, duty to rule, mootness
Williams v. State - mandamus, duty to rule, mootness
LB v. DCF - parental rights, termination, failure to prosecute
Chaky v. State - mandamus, duty to rule, mootness
Hubbert v. Universal P&C - appellate jurisdiction, nonfinal order
Ortega v. RAAC - appellate jurisdiction, untimely appeal
DH v. DCF - parental rights, termination, failure to prosecute

Second District Court of Appeal - St. Petersburg

Richardson v. State - sentencing
EL v. AL - custody, basis to reject expert opinion

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

LA v. State - probation, revocation
Team Health Holdings v. Caceres - dismissal, personal jurisdiction, subsidiary
Pierre v. State - consecutive sentences
IET v. Intellocorp I  & IET v. Intellocorp II - settlement, breach, attorney’s fees
Stern v. City of Miami Beach - dismissal, alternative writ of mandamus, public records
Knights v. Citizens - jury instructions, verdict form
Mesa v. Citizens - policy exclusion, hearsay testimony
Certain Underwriters v. Gables Ct CA - post-loss obligations, appraisal, waiver
Curry v. Crescent Bank - scheduling, trial date
Vera v. Diaz Toledo - MSA, offer, acceptance
Robinson v. State - postconviction relief
Westbrook v. State - pro se filings, prohibition
SMO v. DCF - parental rights, termination, evidence
Moore Bode v. Wilmington Savings - lis pendens
Unborn Child v. Reyes - habeas corpus, unborn child, incarceration, inadequate record

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Ezer v. Holdack - condo association, § 617.07401, derivative suit
Green v. Rockefeller-Silvia - summary judgment standard
Noa v. State - postconviction relief
Key v. State - postconviction relief
Johnston v. State - resisting arrest, sentencing

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Peeples v. Carlton Palms - failure to prosecute, record activity
HERC Rentals v. Superior Site Srvcs - guaranty, joint liability
Baker v. Volusia County Sheriff - appellate jurisdiction, rendition
Strawder v. State - Spencer warning, pro se
Koppe v. State - open plea, sentence
Simmons v. State - special concurrence; felon, firearm possession
White v. State - Spencer warning, pro se
Santiago v. Posey - paternity, attorney’s fees

Sixth District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

State v. Andreskewicz - unreasonable seizure
Raducan v. State - postconviction relief
Lusby v. Canevari - temporary injunctive relief
Tuohey v. Garcia - preservation of error
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.