Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of July 24 - 28, 2023

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Bouarfa v. DHS - immigration, visa, subject matter jurisdiction
Washington v. Ala Att’y Gen - habeas corpus
Clement v. US Att’y Gen - immigration
Garcia v. Casey - qualified immunity
English v. Fowler - qualified, official immunity
Highland Consulting v. Soule - trade secrets
Sabal Trail v. Sunderman Groves - Natural Gas Act, eminent domain, panel precedent
Drazen v. Pinto - en banc, subject matter jurisdiction, standing

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

No decisions this week

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Inwood Inv v. US Bank - Applegate affirmance; foreclosure, § 702.036(1)
Bateman v. Regions Bank - post-judgment collection, discovery, appellate jurisdiction
701 Palafox v. Scuba Shack - punitive damages, amendment
DAK v. DCF - parental rights, termination, failure to prosecute appeal

Second District Court of Appeal - St. Petersburg

DeLarosa v. State - probation revocation
Murphy v. State - sentencing
TTL v. FAL - child support, fees
Carter v. Blue House Painting - contract claim, summary judgment standard
Kyte v. Discover Bank - fees, prevailing party, fees as costs
Goulding v. Goulding - fees as sanction, entering proposed order verbatim

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Contreras v. State - ineffective assistance, preservation
Shoma v. Gables Inv - direct claims, Tooley test
Graveran v. State - competency determination 
Miami Lakes v. State - retirement benefits, reemployment prohibition
Gallardo v. State - probation violation, hearsay
Adweiss v. Daum - interlocutory order, appellate jurisdiction 
Bucher v. State - probation violation, oral pronouncement discrepancy
Narvaez v. State - postconviction discovery

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Nasef v. Eddy - paternity, contempt, attorney’s fees
Crouse v. Crouse - marital dissolution, alimony
KR v. DCF - parental rights, court-appointed counsel, forfeiture

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Gay v. Gay - certiorari; nonparty, financial discovery
CF v. DCF - parental rights, termination, clear and convincing evidence
DCF v. JJ - dependency, credibility determination, partiality

Sixth District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Laboo v. State - restitution
Travel Ins Facs v. Lee Mem Health Sys - personal jurisdiction
Amil v. Solis - harmless error
Temple v. Melchione - appellate mandate compliance

Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.


The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.