Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of July 3 - 7, 2023
July 08, 2023

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Campbell v. Univ City Develop - ADA, waterslide
Tershakovec v. Ford - class action, automobiles, fraud, FDUTPA
USA v. Jews - sentencing
Ruiz v. US Att’y Gen - immigration, removal, battered spouse
Estate of Keeter v. Comm’r of Int Rev - taxes, TEFRA, partner level determinations
Henderson v. Ford - products liability, prior incidents, untimely disclosed witness
Signor v. Safeco - auto insurance, Florida, cash value calculation

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

Cruz v. State - capital case, direct appeal
Univ of Fla v. Carmody - medical malpractice, presuit, certiorari review
Calhoun v. State - capital case, postconviction relief
In re Fla R App P - amending rule 9.130
In re R Reg Fla Bar - amending bar rule 6-10.3

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Williams v. Williams - marital dissolution, temporary awards
McCall v. State - recalling witness
WB’s Septic & Sitework v. Tucker - construction lien, enforcement, quantum meruit
Miller v. Gordon - parenting plan
Harvey v. Hill - child support
Jennings v. State - belated appeal
TF v. DCF - parental rights, failure to prosecute appeal

Second District Court of Appeal - St. Petersburg

Tampa Port Auth v. Henriquez - ad valorem tax exemptions
Gulf Marine Repair v. Henriquez - ad valorem tax exemptions
Hillsborough Aviation Auth v. Henriquez - ad valorem tax exemptions, certified question
Pio v. Macy’s - premises liability, mall landscaping
Ruiz v. State - postconviction relief
State v. Panebianco - solicitation, seducing, enticing, entrapment
Randolph Farms CA v. Otto - mandatory nonbinding arbitration, condition precedent
Days v. State - probation revocation

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Altman v. Brown - trust, surcharge, attorney’s fees
DMT v. State - § 810.0975(2)(b), vagueness, standing
Fonseca v. Regions Bank - voluntary dismissal, jurisdiction
Green v. State - postconviction relief
HJ v. DCF - parental rights, termination
Atrium Med v. MSP Recovery - mandamus, final judgment, right to entry
Kessler v. Miami-Dade Cnty - second-tier certiorari, due process

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Naranjo v. Ochoa - dissolution, advanced inheritance

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Ernfridsson v. Ward - dissolution, attorney’s fees, findings
Casiano v. Casiano - partition, judicial sale, attorney’s fees
Tucker v. Tucker - dissolution, timesharing, parental responsibility

Sixth District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Baute v. Crenshaw - staying litigation
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.