Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of June 12 - 16, 2023

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Cordero v. Transamerica - structured settlement, Adult Protective Services Act
Wright v. Waste Pro USA - FLSA, tolling
CFPB v. Check & Credit - discovery sanctions

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

Coates v. RJ Reynolds - § 768.79, fee-shifting

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

ANR v. DCF - parental rights, termination, failure to prosecute appeal
Taylor v. State - manslaughter, evidence
Leverette v. State - search affidavit, unsealing; interrogation
Morin v. State - double jeopardy
Franxman v. Franxman - marital dissolution
Pun v. Pun - child relocation
Silvia v. Castle Key - insurance, appraisal
State v. Bercaw - suppression hearing, continuance
Wright v. AHCA - Medicaid, fair hearing, publication of orders
Retherford v. Kirkland - service of process

Second District Court of Appeal - St. Petersburg

Wilmington Sav v. Payton - foreclosure, standing, lost note
Desch v. S Fork HA - foreclosure, association assessment, lien
Hutchinson v. State - postconviction relief
Smith v. State - postconviction relief
Petzold v. Castro - certiorari, discovery, privilege
Metullus v. Storm Restoration - small claims court, rehearing/new trial motion

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Yeyille v. Speigel - pro se filings, sanctions
Shojaee v. Duarte-Viera I - certiorari, protective order, financial records
Shojaee v. Duarte-Viera II - certiorari, discovery order, third-party records
Grommers v. Pla - certiorari, voluntary dismissal, jurisdiction
FPL v. Velez - prohibition, disqualification

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Roberson v. Enterprise - malicious prosecution, qualified privilege
Morales v. Iqbal - specific performance
Serrano v. Dickinson - proximate cause, intervening cause
Desanto v. Grahn - amendment, punitive damages, proffer

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Goodwin v. State - concurrence, inconsistent verdicts
Eadie v. Gillis - timesharing, contempt
Burgess v. State - community control, revocation
Malone v. State - Anders appeal, costs
Brooks v. State - suppression, post-arrest interview
Autoquotes v. Albright - attorney’s fees, entitlement, appellate jurisdiction
Carmona v. State - Anders appeal, scrivener’s error

Sixth District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Pukin v. Pukin - marital dissolution  
Nieves v. State - postconviction relief
Little v. State - possession of firearm
Polk County Sheriff's Office v. T.J.B. - risk protection order
Ringelstein v. Naples Courtyard Inn - closing argument
Parker v. Parker - marital dissolution
Bell v. State - aggravated battery
Gayer v. Nicita - marital dissolution
Maki v. NCP Bayou 2 - mortgage foreclosure
School Dist of Lee County v. Bracci, P.A. - unrequested relief

Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.


The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.