Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of March 6 - 10, 2023
March 11, 2023

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

NRA v. FDLE - firearms, Second Amendment
Pro Airline Flight Control v. Spirit - labor dispute, Railway Labor Act
USA v. Shamsid-Deen - firearms, prior misdemeanor

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

AC v. DCF - pro se sanctions
In re Fam L Forms - amended forms

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

McDonald v. DOC - rule 1.540, final judgment
James v. Teymorzadeh - ejectment, service, pro se
McGhee v. State - sex offender registration
Loveless v. State - postconviction relief
Diekow v. State - motion to dismiss information
Shands v. Beylotte - certiorari, patient safety work product
Alderman v. Bradford Cnty - duty of care, site plan, government official
Strattan v. State - mandamus, duty to rule, mootness

Second District Court of Appeal - St. Petersburg

Estate of Carter v. Rambaum - contingency fee agreement
Tampa Gen v. Jackman - certiorari, presuit requirements
Flynn v. Flynn - certiorari, discovery, alimony
State v. Wilson - certiorari, discovery, mental health records
Ruiz v. Wendy’s Trucking - premises liability, duty of care

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Martinez v. Martinez - contempt, authority, hearing
Romero v. Midland Funding - account stated, summary judgment, preservation
Total Quality v. Trade Link - forum selection clause
Bacon v. State - pro se filings, prohibition
Destin v. State - dismissal, appellate jurisdiction
Alcazar v. State - habeas corpus, overt act, dissent

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Stephanos v. Stephanos - claim abandonment
Domino v. Dixon - third-party complaint
Progressive v. Imaging Ctr - motion to amend
Caveglia v. Heinen - personal representative, appointment
Lotierzo v. Barbarito - impact rule
Fuentes v. Luxury Outdoor - summary judgment, response
Race v. Mitchell - personal jurisdiction
Kittles v. State - jail credit
Spencer v. Kelner - injunction, excusable neglect
Erren v. Marin - disqualification

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Fetzer v. State - sexually violent predator, prohibition
Ellis v. State - Spencer warning, pro se

Sixth District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Mannella v. Mannella - downward modification of child support, certified conflict
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.