Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of May 15 - 19, 2023
May 20, 2023

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Smith v. Ala DOC - sentencing, Eighth Amendment
Thompson v Regions Sec - FLSA, overtime
Ruiz v. US Att’y Gen - immigration, battered spouses
Global Network v. CenturyLink - implied contract, bailment, Florida law
Hall v. Merola - § 1983, possible Heck bar

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

Orme v. State - capital case, direct appeal
Foley v. State - pro se sanctions

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Newberry v. Alachua - appellate jurisdiction, injunctive relief
Beasley v. United Casualty - summary judgment, continuance
DM v. DCF - parental rights, termination
Gardner v. State - postconviction relief
Gillespie v. FCOR - mandamus, duty to rule
Crusaw v. DOH - administrative appeal, jurisdiction

Second District Court of Appeal - St. Petersburg

Pocock v. Pocock - venue
Hartshorn v. State - postconviction relief
WLT Software v. Brooks - rule 1.540, voluntary dismissal

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Shapiro v. WPLG - sanctions
Larkins v. Mendez - convenience account, civil contempt
FIU Bd of Trs v. Alexandre - sovereign immunity, waiver, certified question
Citizens v. All Ins - wholly favorable judgment
Ozyesilpinar v. Reach - defamation, opinion, permanent injunction 
Lazow v. Synamon - default for possession
Vereit v. Fitness - rent, Covid, force majeure, impossibility, impracticability, frustration of purpose

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Saunders v. Baseball Factory - negligence, duty to protect
Testa v. Jupiter Island - certification, ordinance advertising
McDonald v. State - undisclosed evidence, improper statements
Innocent v. Innocent - dissolution, dissipated assets, child support
Bernardo v. Biemer - dissolution, alimony
HRB Tax v. Fla Inv Bureau - punitive damages, vicarious liability
Duke v. Duke - certiorari, post-judgment discovery

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Enlow v. EC Scott Wright PA - malpractice, accrual
Hawryluk v. Hawryluk - dissolution, support, fees
Babcock v. Golden Acres - dismissal, subject matter jurisdiction
Waskiewicz v. DCF - Institutional Care Program Medicaid benefits
Brutus v. Giles - dissolution, equitable distribution, alimony
Grant v. State - Anders appeal, scrivener’s error
Henslee v. State - Anders appeal, cost
Walters v. State - prohibition, medical records
Melendez v. State - Spencer bar, pro se
Seminole Cty v. APM Constr - certiorari, presuit administrative remedies
Lazaroff v. Meek - new trial, improper counsel statements
Yellow Cab v. Lutchman - damages, set off
Tyson v. State - Richardson hearing, discovery
Warren v. State - Spencer bar, pro se
Williams v. State - Spencer bar, pro se
Williams v. Lomeli - appellate jurisdiction, timeliness
Melendez v. Melendez - dissolution, contempt, appellate jurisdiction

Sixth District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Blanco v. Santana - domestic violence injunction
Gray v. Fla. Peninsula - insurance, statutory construction
David v. Davis - child custody, timesharing
Chambers v. State - postconviction
Shassian v. Riverwalk Park -  appellate jurisdiction, finality
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.