Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of November 13-17, 2023
November 18, 2023

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

USA v. Perez - sentencing, 18 USC § 3147
Powell v. Volusia Sch Bd -  IDEA, ADA, public education

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

Emerson v. Lambert - dangerous instrumentality, vicarious liability
Loyd v. State - capital case, direct appeal

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Perryman v. State - sentencing
Stern v. DeSantis - public records request, fees
Banks v. State - postconviction relief

Second District Court of Appeal - St. Petersburg

Ottone v. Williamson Inv - eviction, unraised evidentiary deficiencies
McQueen v. Baskin - defamation, media defendant, anti-SLAPP

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Kitaygorodskiy v. State - identification testimony, invited response
Heath v. State - sexual offender designation
Scognamillo v. Jamison - dissolution of marriage  rehearing, insufficient record
Philip Morris v. Garcia -  class limitation period
Mercado v. Sridhar - sale contract, enforceability
Dubois v.  Affiliati Network - attorney’s fees, insufficient record
Frantin v. Media Grp - personal jurisdiction, declaration
Saenz v. Sanchez - pre-trial timesharing
DJ v. State - involuntary commitment

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

BWB v. State - written threats, constitutionality
Aileen v. Univ Prop & Caus - verdict, waiver
Taylor v. State - sentencing
Sentz v. Bonefish Grill - slip-and-fall, direct evidence
Harripersad v. Lake Park Gardens - settlement, evidentiary hearing

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Blazejowski v. State - Spencer warning, pro se
Hicks v. State - Spencer bar, pro se
Grimmage v. State - Spencer warning, pro se
Prop Reg Champ v. Mulberry - forum selection clause, contract

Sixth District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Bowein v. Sherman -  contract ambiguity, specific performance
Begonja v. Wyndham Vacation Resorts -  pro hac vice
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.