Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of October 2-6, 2023
October 06, 2023

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Lowery v. AmGuard - appellate jurisdiction, insurance, equitable reformation
CSX v. Gen Mills - indemnification agreements, negligence, vouchment
Yelling v. St Vincent’s - employment, discrimination, retaliation
Harris v. Public Health Tr Miami-Dade - employment, discrimination, hostile environment, retaliation
Edwards v. Dothan City Schools - employment, due process, contract
USA v. Steiger - sentencing, probation revocation
Johnson v. Dunn - search and seizure, qualified immunity
Kemokai v. US Att’y Gen - immigration, aggravated felony, intervening decisions

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

Cruz v. State - capital case, rehearing denied

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Puri v. DCF - administrative appeal, foster home license
Freeman v. State - tipsy coachman, Stand Your Ground
E Coast Waffles v. Haselden - workers’ compensation
White v. State - preservation of error, no-contest plea
State v. Berens - personal property, lien, venison meat
Lumpkin v. State - postconviction relief
Morris v. State - mandamus, mootness, duty to rule
Parson v. State -certiorari, interim writ of mandamus, requiring reasoning
Stanton v. State - mandamus, mootness, duty to rule
Broxton v. State - belated appeal
Slaton v. State - mandamus, mootness, duty to rule

Second District Court of Appeal - St. Petersburg

Hammac v. US Bank - foreclosure, amount owed
Feldman v. State - restitution, hearing

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Citizens v. Salazar -  correct measure of damages, insufficient evidence
Hess v. PMG-S2 Sunny Isles - attorney’s fees, contract
Responsive v. Oasis Diagnostic Ctr -  non-final order, summary judgment evidence
Frehling v. Garcia - property tax assessment benefit, transfer
MP v. Guiribitey - arbitration agreement, unconscionability, arbitrability

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Bd of Trustees v. NE 32nd St - summary judgment, attorney’s fees
Doll v. State - cost of prosecution
Pine v. Pine - attorney’s fees, ripeness
Fort Lauderdale v. Tropical Paradise Resorts - sovereign immunity
People’s Trust v. Jones - appraisal

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Schmidt v. Schmidt - dissolution, alimony, equitable distribution
Sanchez v. Volusia County - nonfinal order, appellate jurisdiction
Varner v. Varner - child visitation
Kani v. Feaster - paternity
Adventist Health v. Machalek - certiorari; med mal, presuit requirements
Newcomer v. State - postconviction relief

Sixth District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Cape Coral Loan v. 924 Del Prado - waiver of affirmative defense
Royal v. Royal - availment of adequate remedy
AHCA v. Payas - subject matter jurisdiction
Robinson v. State - summary disposition
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.