Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of September 4 - 8, 2023

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Ossmann v. Meredith - employment, discrimination
USA v. Graham - grand jury, Covid-19 procedures; wiretaps
USA v. Talley - supervised release, absconding, tolling
Ingram v. Holman Correctional - postconviction relief
Mashburn v. Ala DOC - habeas corpus
Security Walls v. NLRB - labor, termination

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

In re R Reg Fla Bar - amended bar rules
In re Fla Fam Law R Pro - amended disclosure rule
In re Fla R GP & JA - amendments, dissent
Calvin v. State - pro se sanctions
In re Fla Fam L R Pro - amended rules

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Davis v. State - scrivener’s error
Monarch Claims v. Fleming - venue selection clause
State v. McCartha - warrantless arrest, vehicle involved in crash
Parrish v. FOFR - mortgage loan originator license, annulment, denial
Iarussi v. LobbyTools - corporations, attorney’s fees indemnification

Second District Court of Appeal - St. Petersburg

Heart of Adoptions v. DCF - certiorari, child placement
Certified Motors v. Aventine Hill - commercial lease, renewal option
Godwin v. Michelini - certiorari, anti-SLAPP dismissal

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Brownlee v. State - probation revocation, ineffective assistance
Freire v. Citizens - summary judgment, continuance, late notice 
AT&T v. Rigney - section 57.105 sanctions 
Ponn v. Metro Express - inadequate record 
Denose v. Garcia - dismissal, failure to effectuate service 
Hirschenson v. Compu-Link - deed ambiguity, reformation 
Colby III v. Centennial - final order, jurisdiction 
State  v. Williams - certiorari, confidential informant disclosure
King v. City First - foreclosure sale, objections
Bath & Kitchen v. Little - certiorari, financial discovery
Lucas v. State - habeas, ineffective assistance

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Perlman v. Atlas Holding - charging lien
Bartee v. State - judgment, correction
Blount v. State - plea withdrawal

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Marlowe v. City of St Augustine - clarification; summary judgment, property boundaries
Gurolla v. State - attempted murder; discovery violation, Richardson hearing
Sanchez v. State - Anders appeal, corrected judgment

Sixth District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

A-1 Prof'l Asphalt v. North Groves Condo. -  preservation of error
Santiago v. State - revocation of community control

Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.


The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.