Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of June 17-21, 2024
U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals
Rosales-Mendez v. US Att’y Gen - immigration, removal hearing, notice
Tanner v. Stryker - FMLA, retaliation
USA v. Harding - extrinsic evidence, limiting instruction, new trial
Va Redding v. Coloplast - products liability, mesh implant, limitations period
Spears v. Patel - FLSA, individual as liable employer
PB Legacy v. Am Mariculture - magistrate judge participation in trial, lack of consent
USA v. Harden - search and seizure
DeSantis v. Dream Defenders - riot, participation, 11th Circuit certified question
In re J Woolsey - judicial discipline
In re Family L Forms - amended forms
Ford v. State - aggravated stalking, evidence, substantial emotional distress
Richardson v. State - double jeopardy
Smith v. State - prohibition, immunity from prosecution
Simmons v. State - similar act evidence
Heath v. State - continuance; evidence, prior incidents
Carter v. State - search and seizure
DW v. State - discovery violation, Richardson hearing
Zuniga-Mejia v. State - postconviction relief
Irick v. Jones - lack of trial transcript
Whitacre v. Ragan - timesharing, modification, due process
Norman v. RAAC - unemployment, referee’s decision, time to appeal
Philip Morris v. Chadwell - Engle-progeny action, reliance, evidence
Hernandez v. State - speedy trial waiver, evidence
Katha v. SHEDDF3-AE - foreclosure, standing, assignment
Health & Wellness v. Infinity - letter of representation, hearsay
951 Harbor Dr v. SD Constr - claim-splitting, waiver
Del Valle v. SafePoint - preservation, insufficient record
Fuentes v. Link - quiet title, conveyance, evidence
Imani Elite Props v. City of Mia - jurisdiction, exhaustion of administrative remedies
Mendez v. CASA Fin Holdings - rule 1.540(b)(5) motion
Zanah v. Account Servs - FDCPA, debt validation
Valdes v. Verona at Deering Bay CA - premises liability, notice
City of Mia Beach v. Brockhouse - dismissal, notice, due process
Carbonell v. Glade - proceedings supplementary, sanctions, homestead
Ortega v. Burger King - premises liability, independent contractor, punitive damages
Djurasevic v. Thompson - foreclosure, standing
Imperial Air Servs v. Flores - service, insufficient record
Smith v. Smith - timesharing, evidence
Hart v. Dade Cnty Fed Credit Union - insufficient record
XBTO Mining v. Crypto Caverns - temporary injunction, evidence
Aguilar v. Ocana - insufficient record
Vazquez v. B & R Supermarket - referee’s findings
Angilot v. DOR - child support, evidence, preservation
BD v. DCF - certiorari, mental health examination
Noel v. State - probation, restitution
Publix v. Safonte - constructive knowledge, slip and fall
Malley v. Malley - parenting plan
Carmel v. Fleicher - standing, interested person
Bailey v. PTIC - insurance, bad faith
Hasbrouck v. State - oral plea withdrawal
Conde v. Conde - dissolution, goodwill, multi-member medical practice
Rosenberg v. Rosenberg - certified question; dissolution, goodwill, medical practice
Bison Roofing v. Gentile - dismissal, withdrawal, new counsel
SW v. DCF - Medicaid benefits
Hazan v. Reid - civil battery, lack of transcript, preservation
Sloan v. Fisher - new trial, closing argument
Morgenier v. J Dickert Pop Health Srvcs - certiorari; discovery, confidential health information
JL v. State - Anders appeal, corrected order
Orlando Health v. Mohan - rehearing; punitive damages, amendment; intent, gross negligence
Harris v. State - habeas corpus
King Reyes Transport v. Baker - dilatory litigation tactics
State v. Petit-Frere - death sentencing procedure
The provided links above may be available for a limited time only, as courts sometimes relocate opinions on their websites. Should that occur, please use the “written opinions archive” links provided below each court header to search for the opinion using the case name. The availability of opinions through these channels may vary and is subject to the discretion of the courts.
The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.