Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of December 16-20, 2024

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

NLRB v. ArrMaz Products - collective bargaining, election
Lubin v. Starbucks - class action, ERISA, arbitration
USA v. Ogiekpolor - speedy trial

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee


Craft v. State - capital case, postconviction relief

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee


Fogarty v. State - sexual battery, helpless, evidence, inference-stacking
Nipper v. State - defendant’s absence at trial
Mooney v. State - murder, evidence, lesser included
Rhodes v. State - appellate jurisdiction, plea withdrawal
Williams v. State - probation violation
Anderson v. State - striking initial brief, Anders, certified question
Anderson v. State - striking initial brief
Beecher v. State - search and seizure
Barnes v. State - animal cruelty

Second District Court of Appeal - St. Petersburg


Young v. State - plea withdrawal
Watson v. State – probation revocation
Eskra v. State – probation revocation
Cancel v. Cancel – equitable distribution
Campana v. Trabold – no contact order

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami


Meruelo v. Pine Tree Dev - foreclosure, mootness
Leggett v. State - postconviction relief
Meruelo v. Meruelo - marital settlement, mootness
Dixon v. World Fiber Techs - new trial, additur
Jacome v. People's Tr - late notice, presumption of prejudice
State v. Lainez - Miranda rights, request for lawyer
Marsdreamland v. MTGLQ Invs - foreclosure, surplus funds
SafePoint v. Schnepel - denial of coverage, post-loss conditions, waiver
Morris v. City of Mia - public records request, deposition
EPR 10 v. Wilson - deficiency judgment, evidence
Gomez v. Nichols - receivership, leave to sue, insufficient record
Citizens v. Jaehnig - jury instructions
Tien v. Tax Collector - declaratory relief, cause of action
Krapff, Gray & Nightengale Props v. Wilmington Tr - findings, evidence
Diaz v. Dixon - habeas, previously raised matters
Ferreira v. MTGLQ Inv - insufficient record
Scott v. Stewart - malicious prosecution, recusal of judge, insufficient record
Pulwer v. Pearl Brothers - appellate jurisdiction
Gabbay v. Invin Beach - possession of dwelling unit, rent
Aria Reserve 5005 v. S Park Tower - temporary injunction, evidentiary hearing
Trujillo v. Garcia - lis pendens, action for damages
Oria v. Velastegui - parenting plan, modification, default
Lugo v. State - certiorari, trial transcripts, access

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach


Atwell v. State – probable cause, DUI, citizen arrest
Fla Citizen’s Alliance v. Indian River – Sunshine Law, textbook committee
Bronner v. Longden – paternity, acknowledgment, fraud, due process

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Staly v. Izotova - sovereign immunity, notice requirements, § 768.28(6)
N Brevard Cnty Hosp Dist v. Deligdish - certiorari; immunity, dismissal
Jones v. State - postconviction relief
Dugan v. State - postconviction relief
Young v. State – postconviction relief, jurisdiction
Brodman v. State - ineffective assistance, appellate
Clark v. Hahn - personal injury, biomechanical expert testimony, scope

Sixth District Court of Appeal - Lakeland


Green v. State - evidence suppression
Reyna-Duran v. State - postconviction relief
Williams v. State - postconviction relief
Story v. State - summary disposition
KD v. State - Richardson hearing
Concepcion v. Diaz - summary disposition
De Souza v. State - postconviction relief


The provided links above may be available for a limited time only, as courts sometimes relocate opinions on their websites. Should that occur, please use the “written opinions archive” links provided below each court header to search for the opinion using the case name. The availability of opinions through these channels may vary and is subject to the discretion of the courts.

©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.