Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of February 5 - 9, 2024
February 09, 2024

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Baughcum v. Jackson - firearms regulation, constitutional challenge, justiciability
Jumlist v. Prime Ins - insurance, limitations, accrual, policy limit
USA v. Sanfilippo - wire fraud, limitations, waiver by plea
Lodge v. US Att’y Gen - derivative citizenship, constitutional challenge
Battle v. Ga DOC - Title V ADA claims, sovereign immunity
Carson v. Monsanto - products liability, preemption, FIFRA, Roundup litigation

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

In re Fla R Civ P - rehearing denial, apex depo amendment
Trappman v. State - double jeopardy
In re Fla R GP&JA - amended rule 2.420, court records

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

In re Doe 23-B - abortion, judicial waiver, certified questions
Paylan v. DOH - medical license, suspension and non-renewal, challenges, forum and timing
Killick v. Benedict - small claims, summary disposition, unpled issues

Second District Court of Appeal - St. Petersburg

State v. Domenech - search and seizure
Gillette v. State - probation revocation
Loanflight Lending v. Bankrate - forum selection clause
In re DH v. KJR - Marchman Act petition, sufficiency

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Arrow v. People's Tr - contract ambiguity, extrinsic evidence
City of Mia Beach v. Cosme - dismissal of charges, invited error
Vindel v. Stewart - authentication of records, prejudgment interest, attorney’s fees
Ware v. State - prohibition, Logan dismissal
RMA v. State - relinquishment of jurisdiction
Hernandez v. State - habeas, custody
Bisch v. Peki - summary judgment, medical malpractice, causation
Mowder v. Smith - oral contract, statute of frauds, part performance

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Smart v. State - public defender’s fee
Perseo v. Donofrio - parental timesharing
Curtis v. Hollywood - community redevelopment, relocation assistance
Presidio v. Feeny - contract, bonus plan
Biose v. Orasan - personal jurisdiction

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Levin v. State - Spencer warning, pro se
Little v. Turnbow - vacate dismissal, rule 1.540(b)(1)

Sixth District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

State v. S.G. - suppression, voluntariness of statements
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.