Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of January 22 - 26, 2024

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Lodge v. US Att’y Gen - derivative citizenship, constitutional challenge
Blanco v. Samuel - employment, overtime, nanny
USA v. Daniels - Hobbs Act, eyewitness identification, sentencing

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

In re Fla R Crim Pro - amended rule

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Moon-Vileno v. Fla Ass’n of Court Clerks - class action, convenience fee, clerks
Rudolph v. Smith - workers’ compensation
Shrewsbury v. Childers - tax assessment, challenge, timeliness

Second District Court of Appeal - St. Petersburg

State v. Crose - sex offender, registration, prior criminal sanction
Driscoll v. Knellinger - certiorari, immunity, litigation privilege

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Michel v. State -  lewd or lascivious battery, issue preservation
Clements v. Club Space Mgmt - discovery violations, sanctions
Curry v. State - principal in first degree
Perez v. State - child support, modification
Patlan v. State - postconviction relief
Slattery v. State - postconviction relief

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Palanchian v. Windstone POA - appellate jurisdiction, settlement agreement
US Bankcorp v. Taharra - quiet title
Goga v. Publix - dismissal, sanction
Morali v. Mayan - contract, assent
Adams v. Cunningham - dissolution, temporary support
Meadows v. KAC 2021-1 - transfer venue
Phoenix Mgmt v. Waterchase HOA - punitive damages

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Only citation opinions this week

Sixth District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Pial Holdings v. Riverfront Plaza -  contract construction, loan guarantee

Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.


The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.