Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of March 11 - 15, 2024
U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals
Navarro Guadarrama v. US Att’y Gen - immigration
Alabama Creditors v. Dorand - bankruptcy, retirement account
USA v. Markovich - Brady, motion to compel; expert testimony; lay witness summary
McHugh v. Glass - default judgment
Purpose Built Families v. USA - APA, termination notice, withdrawal, mootness
Adams v. Palm Bch Cnty - FLSA, employees, golf attendants
Sylvester v. Fulton Cnty Jail - search and seizure
Baker v. Upson Reg’l Med - employment, Equal Pay Act, Title VII, pay disparity
Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee
No decisions this week
First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee
Cottondale Inv v. W-ACQ Vacation Rentals - certiorari, landlord-tenant
Brown v. State - sentencing
Mack v. State - sentencing, mootness
Godwin v. McKamey - Applegate affirmance
Cleveland v. State - written opinion motion granted
Fountain v. Dixon - pro se sanctions
Moreno v. State - plea colloquy, sentencing, human smuggling
Fernandez v. DOC - habeas corpus, pro se sanctions
Granville v. State - mandamus, mootness
Second District Court of Appeal - St. Petersburg
ND v. JB - paternity
Gibson v. Star Collision - default judgment, service
White v. State - replevin
DP v. DCF - reunification, appeal, certiorari, jurisdiction
CHHS Hosp v. Harmon - amending pleadings
Johnson v. State - postconviction relief
Third District Court of Appeal - Miami
Facey v. State - admissibility of victim’s convictions
Morales v. Cruz - relocation with minor children, preservation
Roosevelt 26 v. Trejo - foreclosure, notice of trial
N Bay Green Invs v. Cold Pressed - election of remedies, settlement agreement, res judicata
Envision v. GEICO - exhaustion of PIP benefits
Hurtado v. Warren Gammill & Assocs - leave to amend, punitive damages
Stoppa v. Infinity Oaks - residential eviction, default
Arias v. Codealtex - premises liability
Larioszambrana v. State - habeas, admissibility of child victim’s statements
Avila v. Biscayne 21 Condo - termination of condominium, temporary injunction
Siegmeister v. Hellard - equitable distribution, marital property, insufficient record
Peralta v. State - postconviction relief
Cuesta v. Estevanell - premises liability
Rogers v. State - violation of plea agreement, civil commitment
Williams v. State - postconviction relief
5350 Park v. Grycon - summary judgment, negligence, preservation
Tien v. Abad - standing
Goldstein v. DBPR - real estate broker license revocation, notice of action
Montemurro v. Obaya - child support, alimony
Citizens v. Rodriguez - policy exclusion, bolstering
Speck v. Mejia - summary affirmance
Morgan v. State - resentencing, factors
Lima v. Intermarine Invs - foreign judgment, comity
Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach
Lee v. State - jury decision, constitutionality
Quarles v. State - sentencing
Cadejuste v. State - preservation, investigative costs
Ocean v. State - sentencing
Portner v. Koppel - settlement agreement
Shah v. Siddiqui - attorney’s fees, jurisdiction
J&C Resources v. Glodek - personal jurisdiction, evidentiary hearing
KM v. KB - parental rights, incarceration
Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach
Sona v. Foundation Srvcs - certiorari; partial final judgment, leave to amend
Williams v. Weaver - summary judgment, slip and fall
Morreale v. State - prohibition; dismissal, statute of limitations
Reiber v. Yamasaki - forum non conveniens
Bailor v. State - drug offender probation, scrivener’s error
Sixth District Court of Appeal - Lakeland
Greene v. State - reasonable suspicion for investigatory stop
Santiago v. State - sentencing
Fla Invs Unlimited v. Tunmarello - punitive damages
Dominguez v. Omana - in camera inspection
The provided links above may be available for a limited time only, as courts sometimes relocate opinions on their websites. Should that occur, please use the “written opinions archive” links provided below each court header to search for the opinion using the case name. The availability of opinions through these channels may vary and is subject to the discretion of the courts.
The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.