Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of March 4 - 8, 2024
U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals
Amerisure v. Landmark - appellate jurisdiction, pending claims
Edwards v. US Att’y Gen - immigration, removal, asylum, aggravated felony conviction
USA v. Gbenidio - illegal drug dispensing, indictment sufficiency, evidence
USA v. Dubois - Second Amendment, firearms, knowledge, controlled substance, sentencing
Honeyfund.com v. Fla Gov - First Amendment, Individual Freedom Act, workplace training
Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee
Faircloth Guardianship v. Main Street Ent - comparative fault statute, scope
Statewide GAL v. CC - parental rights, termination
First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee
Scott v. State - child hearsay
Hausler v. Hausler - marital dissolution, attorney’s fees, after-the-fact
Brown v. State - probation revocation
Pitts v. Brown - certiorari, expert witness, attorney’s fees in cert cases
Casey v. Mistral CA - condominium, balcony railing, maintenance duty
Kilcrease v. Brown - child support, trial court jurisdiction, simultaneous proceedings
Second District Court of Appeal - St. Petersburg
Garner v. State - sentencing
Kozminski v. Koeppen - real property, specific performance
Advantage Limo v. Simmons - rule 1.442, settlement proposals, ambiguity
Daniels v. Readycap - guarantee, res judicata
Shrivastava v. CAC Pharma - arbitration
Third District Court of Appeal - Miami
Ross v. Citizens - summary judgment standard
Sanchez v. Sec First - presuit notice under s. 627.70152, retroactivity
Sommers v. Philip Morris - Engle-progeny action, punitive damages
Ortega v. All Dade Fences - presumption of negligence, attorney’s fees
Lawton v. State - civil commitment, probable cause for release
Pianezza v. MIA Collection Servs - personal jurisdiction, corporate shield doctrine
Gonzalez v. City of Coral Gables - late service, good cause
Dev-Land Demolition v. Trekker - verdict, evidence, jury instructions, invited error
Levy v. Levy - post-dissolution proceeding, suit money, attorney’s fees
Valdivieso v. Citizens - appraisal, attorney’s fees
Ingraham v. State - postconviction relief
Otero v. AAA - negligence, duty
Quality Diagnostic v. Responsive - false application
Valdes v. State - community control, discrepancy between written order and oral pronouncement
Med Rehab v. Direct Gen - intervention
AGI Traffic Sch v. DHSMV - contract termination, evidence
Sutton v. Wilmington Tr - certiorari, financial discovery
Telesco v. Nat’l Concrete - certiorari, discovery prior to arbitrability determination
Vault Reciprocal v. Luria - certiorari, work product
Brewer v. Hughes - prohibition, disqualification of judge
Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach
Henriquez v. State - written findings
Lee v. State - prosecution costs
Lillard v. State - sentencing
Lillard v. State - written findings
Pino v. Pino - due process, testimony
Selz v. McKagen - certified conflict
State v. Morris - ineffective assistance
Palacios v. Lawson - med mal, arbitration
Fellsmere v. Almanza - code lien foreclosure
Herman v. Smiley - jurisdiction, judicial records
Broyes v. State - scrivener’s error
State v. Tyson - reasonable suspicion
Kaplan v. DCF - termination parental rights, moot
Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach
Dora v. Morrison - probate, non-adversary; strike, procedure
ER Env v. Sihle Financial - negligence, fiduciary duty, summary judgment
Rampe v. State - criminal, judgment, sentence, probation
Poole v. State - Spencer warning, pro se
Sixth District Court of Appeal - Lakeland
Campbell v. State - sentencing, oral pronouncement
Lee County v. Dean Wish - attorney’s fees
Morris v. Boyer - enforcement of settlement
Statewide GAL v. DCF - authority of GAL
The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.