Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of November 4-8, 2024

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Joseph v. Ga Bd of Regents - Title IX, implied right of action, sex discrimination
Project Veritas v. CNN - defamation, Twitter deplatform
USA v. Maisonet - sentencing  
Swinford v. Santos - § 1983, excessive force, qualified immunity, video at pleading stage

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee


Mitchell v. Race - certified conflict jurisdiction, no clear conflict
In re Fla R GP & JA - amended rule, court reporters
In re Fla Prob R - amended rule, oath of personal representative

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee


N Broward Hosp Dist v. AHCA - audits, emergency services, undocumented immigrants
Richardson v. State -  competency
Richardson v. State - rule 3.800(b)(2)
Miami Donuts v. Villarreal - workers’ compensation
AFSCME v. PERC - mootness
Baity v. State - habeas corpus, pro se sanctions
ACC v. FSU - certiorari, stay, college sports

Second District Court of Appeal - St. Petersburg


Rivera v. State - resisting officer, justifiable stop, search and seizure
Bessey v. CILB - contractor license, suspension, recovery fund
Mota v. USAA - settlement, enforcement, proposed release

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami


Acosta v. State - robbery, murder, firearm, evidence, character evidence
Ospina-Shone v. Shone - divorce, attorney’s fees, evidence
Richards v. State - jury, assault, evidence, closing
TIJ v. State - resisting without violence, investigatory stop, evidence
State v. Vinokurov - rehearing, evidence suppression, motorboat stop, plain view
Swerdlow v. Royal Oaks Lane - foreclosure, deficiency judgment, amendment to pleading
Midland Credit Mgmt v. Maitland - no service, dismissal with prejudice, hearing
SUR v. Fondo de Inversión Stella - non-joinder of party, preservation
Aday v. Universal - appellate jurisdiction, denial of rehearing
Rigg v. Bank of Am - no service, dismissal without prejudice, tipsy coachman
Phil Harris Constr v.  Action Rentals Holdings - breach of contract, insufficient record
Abramov v. NextGear Cap - garnishment, exemption, joint account
Tews v. Trade Music Int’l - possession, no rent

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach


Safeco v. Heikka - third-party bad faith, disqualification
Gilbert v. State - sentencing, judicial notice
Coniglio v. State - downward departure
Kajaine Capital v. Abouzeid - breach of fiduciary duty, damages
O’Brien v. O’Brien - alimony, modification
Navy Fed Credit Union v. Veros Credit - garnishment, jurisdiction
Palm Beach v. Fla. PACE - home venue privilege
Gallagher v. State - pro se, discovery deposition

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Lutgens v. State - restitution order, notice of appeal, jurisdiction
La Fiduciaria v. Portuguez - personal jurisdiction, declaration
Smith v. Universal Prop - certified conflict; pre-suit notice, § 627.70152
Ashford v. State - sentencing
Zaidman v. State - Anders appeal, scrivener’s error
Leggett v. State - marijuana odor, investigatory detention, exclusionary rule

Sixth District Court of Appeal - Lakeland


Petro Welt Trading v. Brinkmann - due process, arguments never raised
Creative Hardscapes v. Prawzik - attorneys’ fees, nature of dismissal
Andrillon v. State - sentencing
Henry v. Henry - summary adjudication
Lott v. Reemployment Assistance - summary adjudication


The provided links above may be available for a limited time only, as courts sometimes relocate opinions on their websites. Should that occur, please use the “written opinions archive” links provided below each court header to search for the opinion using the case name. The availability of opinions through these channels may vary and is subject to the discretion of the courts.

Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.