Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of October 28-November 1, 2024

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Schleider v. GVDB Operations - removal, remand, federal officer
USA v. Lightsey - sentencing, ACCA
Romano v. John Hancock - foreign tax credits, ERISA
Davis v. Ala DOC - habeas corpus
Stansell v. Bello - default judgment, discovery
VFS Leasing v. Markel - banking, check, drawer discharge by deposit, Fla law
Cassidy v. Fla DOC - habeas corpus
Ga v. Latham - elections, prosecution, removal

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee


In re Arbitrators - amended rule
In re R Reg Fla Bar - amended rule
In re Fla R GP & JA - amended rule

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee


Parker v. State - sentencing
Sudano v. Collier Sheriff - workers’ compensation
Wallace v. State - habeas corpus

Second District Court of Appeal - St. Petersburg


AA v. MA - imputed income, child support
KAC 2021-1 v. Am Homes 4 Rent - FCCPA, notice, litigation privilege
Wheeler v. Dovey - fee award, deceased party

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami


United v. Coral Gables Chiropractic - attorney’s fees, payment of claim
Imperial Paving v. Trujillo - forum non conveniens, factors
Citizens v. Fontus - preservation, objection
Ragan v. State - collateral crime evidence, double jeopardy
Lent v. Everglades Foundation - indirect criminal contempt
Robbins Bank of NY Mellon - case reopening
Sotolongo v. SafePoint - late notice, presumption of prejudice
Blue CA v. Blue Grouper Ventures - prejudgment interest, permanent injunction
River Front MA v. N Inv Grp - punitive damages, leave to amend, evidence
BJG v. State - firearm, lay witness opinion testimony
Rickard v. Innovative Techs & Consulting - mediation fees, case jurisdiction
Lorenzo v. Homeowners Choice - settlement agreement, enforcement
Etienne v. Citizens - summary judgment, cause of damage
Smith v. State - postconviction relief
Smith v. Gonzalez - stalking, legitimate purpose
Palter v. Sunset Palm Villas CA - summary judgment, unauthenticated evidence
Crouch v. Brume - sanctions
KW v. DCF - parental rights, advisory hearing, jurisdiction
Sanchez v. Irizarry - default, excusable neglect
Palmer v.  Rashawn - dismissal, vexatious litigant
DKT v. State - self-defense, evidence
Washington v. State - postconviction relief

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach


Beer v. State – ineffective assistance; failure to call witness
Domnin v. Domnina – temporary relief; due process; hearing termination
Wells Fargo v. Gopher – punitive damages; amendment; managing agent

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Green v. State - filing restrictions, pro se
Epps v. Maro - fraud on the court, dismissal

Sixth District Court of Appeal - Lakeland


Aguilar v. Dept of Rev - failure to participate
Cuff v. Thirston  - service of process
James v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr - summary disposition


The provided links above may be available for a limited time only, as courts sometimes relocate opinions on their websites. Should that occur, please use the “written opinions archive” links provided below each court header to search for the opinion using the case name. The availability of opinions through these channels may vary and is subject to the discretion of the courts.

Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.