Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions Week of December 15 - 19, 2025

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

 

USA v. Jones - drug, gun crimes; evidence, improper closing; questioning re Miranda
Gantt v. Everett - § 1983, qualified immunity
USA v. Keegan - hearsay, medical diagnosis exception
Creative Choice Homes v. Amtax - partnership agreements, ouster, breach
Nat’l Small Bus v. DOT - Corp Transparency Act, identifying owners, constitutional challenges
Ala NAACP v. Ala Att’y Gen - elections, absentee ballots, gifts, certified questions to Ala SC
Williams v. Shapiro - ERISA, arbitration
Humphreys v. Ga DOC - postconviction relief
Walls v. DOC - postconviction relief

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee


No decisions this week

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee


Flowers v. State - sentencing

Second District Court of Appeal - St. Petersburg


Bartley Inv v. Menendez - negligence, premises liability, security
Young v. State - Anders, costs
Highsmith v. Britten - rule 1.540, fraud

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami


Marine Design v. All City - late-disclosed evidence, prejudice, concurrence
Miguel v. Miguel - attorney’s fees, sanction, no evidentiary hearing
Stolyar v. Hochstein - disqualification of counsel
Cade v. State - mandamus, sentence, no written order
Robinson v. State - life imprisonment, constitutionality
Geopath v. Espinosa - certiorari, no irreparable harm
Lan v. Est of Ridinger - class claim, agreement to arbitrate
USAA Cas v. MPS Recovery - personal jurisdiction, pure bill of discovery
Broche v. Broche - adoption of proposed order verbatim
Kasowitz v. Kasowitz - domestic violence, injunction
Bair v. Alert - substantial truth doctrine
Diaz v. Universal  - post-loss affirmative defenses, no waiver 
Magarino v. Bank of NY - insufficient record
Ofer v. Metro Mortg - order to show cause, pro se filings

 

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach


Sky Aviation v. Aviation Unlimited - limited contract remedies, summary judgment
Herman v. Ewers - appellate preservation, reply brief, JNOV, business value, damages
Guzman v. Fremontsmith - Rule 1.070(j), service of process
Wilson v. Universal Prop - insurance, delayed notice of loss, material breach, prejudice
Cooksey v. Ocean Ridge - dismissal with prejudice, amendment
Friend v. Serpa - AI phantom authority; pro se
New Leaf Assets v. Jerue - contract, reasonable time to perform, ambiguity
Mistivar v. Broward Sheriff - vexatious litigant, s. 68.093
Cohen v. Alkobi - marital dissolution, general magistrate, findings, evidence
Capps v. Capps - marital dissolution, emergency, child protection, due process

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

 

Walsh v. Walsh - dissolution, equitable distribution, valuation
Reynolds v. Belk - trip and fall, open and obvious danger, inherent danger, summary judgment
Kidwell Grp v. Citizens Prop Ins - dismissal; homeowner’s insurance, assignment, § 627.7152(2)(a)4.
Harrington v. State - Anders appeal; jurisdiction, notice of appeal, ministerial resentencing
DeBenedictis v. State - postconviction relief
Bazinet v. Pinkerton - child custody, modification, time-sharing, school designation

Sixth District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Frazier v. Cook - preservation, lack of record
Ward v. State - sentencing, harmless error
Geico v. Yvars - proposal for settlement, attorneys’ fees
Barros v. Mahmoud - preservation, lack of record


The provided links above may be available for a limited time only, as courts sometimes relocate opinions on their websites. Should that occur, please use the “written opinions archive” links provided below each court header to search for the opinion using the case name. The availability of opinions through these channels may vary and is subject to the discretion of the courts.

Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2026 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.