Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions Week of February 17 - 21, 2025

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Wilson v. Hearos - removal by nonparty, service of process, Ga law
USA v. Lemus - Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act, constitutional challenges

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee


In re Fla R Crim P - amended rule
In re Fla R Juv P - amended forms

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee


McDonald v. State - double jeopardy
Girardin v. AN Ft Myers Imports - workers’ compensation
Cooper v. State - fundamental error
Gov DeSantis v. Fla Ctr for Gov Account - public records
Fowler v. Burnham - real property, restrictive covenant, injunction
Pace v. Dixon - trial court dismissal, notice, due process
Miller v. FCOR - criminal proceedings, fees and liens exemption
Roberson v. State - mandamus, duty to rule, mootness

Second Distric Court of Appeal - St. Petersburg


Knowles v. State - restitution beyond county court jurisdiction

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami


Alfaro v. State - harmless error, fundamental error
Thomas v. State - new counsel, arbitrary delay
Correa v. Tovar-Restrepo - trustee, standing
IMC v. Westchester Surplus - policy interpretation, business interruption
Clark v. State - probation violation, evidence
Schmidt v. Martinez-Lejarza - arbitration, evidentiary hearing
Castro v. State - verdict unanimity, alternative acts
Pacheco v. Acebo - rehearing, sexual harassment, exhaustion of administrative remedies
Bouchard v. Citizens - late notice, presumption of prejudice
City of Miami v. Marcos - striking of pleadings, evidence
Kymed v. Malek - arbitrability, partition
Buckley v. Rubino - dismissal, failure to amend
Thomas v. State - postconviction relief
Abdallah v. State - postconviction relief
Universal v. Medero - attorney’s fees, multiplier
Magana v. Machado - alimony, insufficient record, rehearing
Awad v. Doyle - insufficient record
Greenwood v. Greenwood - parental responsibility, modification, due process
Camille v. Miami-Dade Cnty - removal, appellate jurisdiction
Crockett v. SCG Atlas - settlement agreement, insufficient record
Newberry v. US Rd - summary affirmance
DCF v. KJ - certiorari, caregiver, party status
Hamad v. Sarsour - preliminary injunction, transfer of real property
Murphy v. Spinoso - certiorari, timeliness

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

 

Reed v. Reed - marital dissolution, equitable distribution
Ripple v. CBS - on remand; wrongful death; surviving spouse
Bank of NY Mellon v. Lopez - foreclosure, standing, endorsements
Univ Prop & Casualty v. Brilus - insurance, repairs, damages, remittitur
Gordon v. Pinoargotty - eviction, attorney’s fees, calculation
Nunes v. Krup - marital dissolution, equitable distribution
Sublett v. State - burglary, dwelling, porch
Indian River Mem Hosp v. Anderson - medical malpractice, presuit

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Caggiano v. Duval Cnty Sch Bd - free speech, teacher, Facebook
Mneimne v. State - Anders appeal, fee
Polanco v. State - prosecution cost
Holifield v. State - Fourth Amendment, impoundment, inventory
Hood v. State - Anders appeal, costs
Desselles v. State - Anders appeal, costs
Hicks v. Dept of Corr - Spencer warning, pro se  

Sixth District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

State v. Washington - prosecutorial authority
Hamlin v. Shaughnessy Overland Express - dismissal for lack of prosecution
Avery v. State - sentencing

 


The provided links above may be available for a limited time only, as courts sometimes relocate opinions on their websites. Should that occur, please use the “written opinions archive” links provided below each court header to search for the opinion using the case name. The availability of opinions through these channels may vary and is subject to the discretion of the courts.

Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2026 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.