Florida Appeals Court Decisions Week of July 7 - 11, 2025
U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals
Heid v. Rutkoski - § 1983, qualified immunity
Nalco v. Bonday - arbitration, vacatur
Sunshine State v. US CIS - immigration, EB-5, annual fee, retroactivity
AST v. Delclaux - federal question jurisdiction, breach of contract, federal issue
Benshot v. 2 Monkey Trading - bankruptcy
ECB v. Savencia Cheese - personal jurisdiction; pleading sufficiency, Twombly
Patel v. Patel - bankruptcy
Jones v. State - capital case, direct appeal
Wolf v. State - capital case, direct appeal
Steak N Shake v. Ramos - FRCA, exhaustion of remedies, FCHR claims
In re Fla R Crim P - amended rule
Ramcald v. State - probation revocation, competent substantial evidence
Young v. State - murder, opening statement, evidence
Zargari v. Zargari - marital dissolution, alimony, equitable distribution
State v. Reddick - search and seizure, child pornography
Scott v. State - murder, evidence
Ribbing v. State - burglary, value testimony
ADN Global v. DOR - tax assessment, notice of decision, receipt, evidentiary hearing
Dale v. DCF - habeas corpus
Lassen v. Dolphin Tower CA - condo declaration, asbestos abatement
Carpenter v. BVK-Muirfield Village - nonbinding arbitration, attorney’s fees
Alonso v. State - sentencing
Reeves v. State - sentencing
Clark v. State - trial court jurisdiction during appeal
Hillsborough v. GL Acq - second-tier certiorari, rezoning
Hall v. Yohos Auto - treating appeal as prohibition petition
Third District Court of Appeal - Miami
Avila v. Biscayne 21 - termination of condominium, voting rights, certified question
Capote v. SCI Funeral Servs - dismissal, class representative, attorney’s fees
ACF IV v. FDI Cap - security, loan participation agreement
Kritzman v. Kritzman - order to show cause, appellate jurisdiction
De Soleil v. Perrin - condominium common elements, declaration
T & G Locksmith v. Granada - voluntary dismissal, prevailing party attorney’s fees
Roblero v. Velasquez - recommended order, preservation
Gomes v. Maniglia - punitive damages, no proposed amended complaint
Estache v. State - postconviction relief
Rodriguez v. Gonzalez - parenting plan, modification
Fuller v. City of Mia - removal of commissioner, standing
Perkins v. State - competency, nunc pro tunc
Boatwright v. State - severance
Aponte v. Wal-Mart - exclusion, Binger
Loren v. Once Upon A Time - attorney argument, prejudice
PWBC v. Palm Vista - judgment on the pleadings, amendment
Burgess v. State - closing argument
Flaim v. Flaim - marital settlement agreement
Moise v. State - sentencing
Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach
Woodlief v. Woodlief - dissolution, durational alimony, life insurance
Mason v. State - sentence, investigative costs
Gilberts v. Manderino-Gilberts - child support, modification
Urban Air v. Hinton - arbitration, compel
Kelly v. Kelly - alimony, contempt
Dorian Roberts Trust v. FIGA - insurance, pre-suit notice, specificity
Sixth District Court of Appeal - Lakeland
JEJ v. SAB - child support calculation
Leal v. Nuff Said Holdings - summary disposition
Rivera v. State - sentencing, admissibility of evidence
DRM v. State - scrivener’s error
The provided links above may be available for a limited time only, as courts sometimes relocate opinions on their websites. Should that occur, please use the “written opinions archive” links provided below each court header to search for the opinion using the case name. The availability of opinions through these channels may vary and is subject to the discretion of the courts.
The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.