Florida Appeals Court Decisions Week of June 16 - 20, 2025
U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals
Hicks v. Middleton - vicarious liability, employment, course and scope
UHS v. Sec’y of Labor - OSHA, workplace violence, employer
JF v. Carnival - negligence, cruise, sexual assault
Fla Bar v. Martinez - attorney discipline
Lorenzo v. State - capital case, direct appeal
In re Fla R Civ P - amended rule
Colston v. State - murder, evidence, GPS records, cell phone data
Miller v. Conney - future medical expenses, radiofrequency ablation
Cota v. State - Nelson, Faretta hearings
Stettin v. Home Depot - workers’ compensation
Nelson v. State - habitual traffic offenders
State v. Beaman - sentencing
Gooch v. Cowan - mandamus, right to hearing
GEICO v. Hines - certiorari, jurisdiction
Wiendl v. Wiendl - certiorari, “abusive litigant” sanctions
Brito v. Citizens - insurance, first party, damages
Seaborn v. Seaborn - real property, partition, rental value
Turner v. State - closing, harmless error
Eloquence v. CDC Builders - jury instructions, modification
Wilczek v. Calafell - personal injuries, evidence
Menada v. Arevalo - amendment, punitive damages, evidence, concurrence
Husarek v. State - resisting without violence, preservation
Catalina W v. First Cmty - duty to defend or indemnify, physical abuse exclusion, dissent
Universal v. Kattan - attorney’s fees, multiplier, evidence
Ventura v. State - rehearing, carjacking, sentence
Garcia v. Winn-Dixie Stores - summary judgment hearing, continuance
U.S. Alliance v. Apeiron - worthless check, attorney’s fees
Aquastar v. Peckar & Abramson - extinguishment of mortgage, attorney’s fees, non-party
Alvarez v. Gamba - summary judgment, no evidence
Nikiema v. Pascal - land, appurtenance to land
Morant v. State - postconviction relief
FR Aleman v. Kiboko - injunction, covenant not to compete
Genman v. Rinell - tipsy coachman, contract interpretation
Damas v. ARCPE - standing, note, business records
Tropper v. Corti - judgment, evidence
Perdomo v. Teran - personal jurisdiction, affirmative relief
Acosta v. State - postconviction relief
FD v. DCF - termination of parental rights, personal appearance
Harper v. State - postconviction relief
Hall v. State - mandamus, non-party
Arias v. State - sentence, preservation
Deparias v. State - life imprisonment, constitutionality
Fresquet v. State - sentence, preservation
Simmons v. State - life imprisonment, constitutionality
Cohen v. Cohen - attorney’s fees, reasonableness, expert, § 61.16 exception
Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach
Episcopal Children’s Srvcs v. DCF - rule amendment, APA
Schramm v. Adams Homes - summary judgment, premises liability, negligence
CAM Bradford Homes v. Arrants - unlicensed contractor, § 489.119(2), contract enforcement
Memorial Health Sys v. Hamilton Staffing - unjust enrichment, prejudgment interest, date of loss
Squires v. Squires - dissolution, modification, child support, time-sharing
Hale v. State - Anders appeal, written order
Hall v. State - suppression, inculpatory statements, pat-down search, consent
Sixth District Court of Appeal - Lakeland
Ghazall v. Grubb - summary disposition
Saldino v. Saldino - due process, parental timesharing
Allen v. Allen - summary disposition
The provided links above may be available for a limited time only, as courts sometimes relocate opinions on their websites. Should that occur, please use the “written opinions archive” links provided below each court header to search for the opinion using the case name. The availability of opinions through these channels may vary and is subject to the discretion of the courts.
The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.