Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions Week of March 3 - 7, 2025

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Gray TV v. FCC - license, forfeiture, owning top stations in market
Liberty Surplus v. Kaufman - insurance, Fla law, course of construction exclusion, settlement proposal
Rivera v. US Att’y Gen - immigration, asylum

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee


In re Fla R App P - amended rules

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee


Nahoom v. Fla League of Cities - employment, whistleblower
McInnis v. State - murder, theft, evidence
Thompson v. Keith - habeas corpus

Second Distric Court of Appeal - St. Petersburg


Brown v. Safepoint - insurance, § 627.70152, certified conflict
Blankenship v. Nautilus Homes - appellate jurisdiction, finality
Seago v. State - postconviction relief
Farrington v. Carrington Mortgage - foreclosure, fees
Cirillo v. Cirillo - marital dissolution, child support, charging lien
MGM of W Fla v. Manatee - second-tier certiorari, first tier review

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami


Smith v. State - waiver of Miranda rights
Blanch v. Universal - mootness of appeal
Frutafino v. Chile - directed verdict, independent tort doctrine
Williams v. State - probation violation, no written order
BRP-Rotax v. Ciccolini - personal jurisdiction, no evidentiary hearing
Wright-Johnson v. State - search of automobile, plain smell, concurrence
Restrepo v. Aquino - timesharing, child support, modification
Verdasco v. Vazquez - parental responsibility, equitable distribution, attorney’s fees
Verela v. State - information, no deadly weapon allegations
State v. Alahmari - lack of prosecution, sue sponte dismissal
Alfonso v. Maiuri - eviction, no evidentiary hearing, mootness of appeal
Whitehall at Bal Harbour CA v. Raviv - punitive damages, amendment, insufficient allegations
Smith v. Smith - child support, continuance, referral of hearing officer
Weiss v. Greenspoon Marder - Kozel factors, no rehearing, waiver
Lieberman v. Sloto - section 57.105 sanctions, trust interpretation
Fernandez v. Gonzalez - timesharing, modification, insufficient record
Cuff v. State - postconviction relief
RPSS Grp v. Mia Chassis - temporary injunction, adequate remedy at law
Mishkin v. Mishkin - timesharing, temporary suspension
SB v. DCF - dependency, evidence
New Nat’l v. EBJ Sagamore - second-tier certiorari, certificate of appropriateness
Thomas v. State - habeas, disorderly conduct, dissent

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach


Carrasco v. Jimenez - marital dissolution, foreign judgment, jurisdiction
United Healthcare v. North Broward Hosp - arbitration, scope of agreement
Steinberg v. Fiesta HOA - pre-suit demand, mediation, s. 57.105, attorney’s fees
First Fin Northwest v. Laver - attorney’s fees, contract, fee-shifting
Randolph v. State - postconviction relief, Hegstrom, premeditation theory

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Ashford v. State - prison releasee reoffender; sentence, jury right
Spinner v. State - sentencing
Klein v. State - Anders appeal, written order
Williams v. Cook - temporary injunction, factual findings, bond
Lau v. Olude - certiorari; vexatious litigant
Gibson v. State - aggravated abuse, involuntary intoxication, cost of production

Sixth District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Middlebrook v. State - cross-examination, bias
Garner v. Marlin Constr Grp - licensing, statutory construction
Pavilion at Healthpark v. Park Royal Hosp - unrequested injunctive relief


The provided links above may be available for a limited time only, as courts sometimes relocate opinions on their websites. Should that occur, please use the “written opinions archive” links provided below each court header to search for the opinion using the case name. The availability of opinions through these channels may vary and is subject to the discretion of the courts.

Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2026 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.