Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions Week of March 31 - April 4, 2025

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Alabama Aircraft v. Boeing - trade secrets, misappropriation, contractual limits
USA v. O’Steen - public official, extortion, currency disclosure
Grippa v. Rubin - appellate jurisdiction, collateral order doctrine
Milner v. Baptist Health - False Claims Act, res judicata bar

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee


In re Fla R Crim P - amended rules

First Dstrict Court of Appeal - Tallahassee


Glades Restor v. Homeowners Choice ­- amending pleadings
Kimble v. State - closing argument, shifting burden of proof
Baker v. State - drug possession, sentencing

Second Distric Court of Appeal - St. Petersburg


Estate of McLain v. G’ship of McLain - probate, objections, standing
Cleveland v. State - sentencing
Mills v. Kinnan - certiorari, malicious prosecution, absolute immunity
Kinard v. State - sentencing
State v. Young - § 92.565, confession
Ambler v. Bayfront - quantum meruit, unresolved claim

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami


940 Ocean Dr v. Sobe USA - rehearing, attorney’s fees, punitive damages
Reeves v. State - special interrogatory, mandatory minimum
Burley v. Vill S - duty, discharge from involuntary commitment
Lopez v. Miami-Dade Cnty - dangerous condition, no notice
Howard v. State - driving with license suspended with knowledge, evidence
Grimace v. State - civil restitution lien, continuing jurisdiction
Lindstrom v. Lindstrom - paternity, subject matter jurisdiction
Ventura v. State - sentence, preservation
Talley v. State - postconviction relief
Pierce L Grp v. Factor - improper venue
FEO v. DCF - termination of parental rights, consent
FQS Enter v. B & K Factor - dismissal, case jurisdiction
Pulwer v. Samuel - certiorari, deposition of counsel

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach


State v. Argerich - Stand Your Ground, law enforcement, official duties
Back to Mind v. Geico - subject matter jurisdiction, fictitious name
Fowler v. State - probation revocation
Beautiful Outdoors v. Torres - default judgment, unliquidated damages, trial
Quest v. Clarke - Applegate; appellate review, summary judgment denial
Alford v. State - Confrontation Clause, jailhouse phone call, appellate preservation
Farris v. State - outdated jury instruction, fundamental error; opening statement, misleading
Persaud v. State - capias warrant, service of process, statute of limitations, diligent search
Navy Fed Credit v. Camden Summit - garnishment, due process, notice

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Sauls v. State - plea, competency, appellate preservation
Bauer v. Carlson - paternity, intervention
Goodwin v. State - postconviction relief
Lett v. Lett - dissolution, parenting plan, contempt
Galusha v. Lowes - fraud on the court, sanctions
Andrews v. State - Spencer warning, pro se
Rodriguez v. Currey - certiorari; medical records, in-camera review

Sixth District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Sylvaince v. State - lewd or lascivious molestation, acquittal
MTW Jordan v. TNT Educators - default judgment
Ramchanndani v. 111 S Knowles Partners - summary disposition
Jackson v. Burman - summary disposition


The provided links above may be available for a limited time only, as courts sometimes relocate opinions on their websites. Should that occur, please use the “written opinions archive” links provided below each court header to search for the opinion using the case name. The availability of opinions through these channels may vary and is subject to the discretion of the courts.

Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2026 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.